2019•Unpublished venueRequires access

Media and cultural industries

David W. Conklin, Don Lecraw

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The most restrictive foreign ownership regulations have typically prevailed in media and cultural industries in which foreign ownership has often been limited to minority equity ownership. The rationales for these restrictions have been to prevent foreign influence through foreign ownership in these sensitive industries with high social and political impact. In some countries, the media have been an organ of the state used to carry out the mission of the government in power. Foreign investment in the media has been seen as diminishing this government regulatory power. In the Philippines, where the 1991 changes in the Foreign Investment Act swept away most sectoral restrictions, those on media were retained. As of 1994, The Republic of Korea had a total ban on foreign investment in mass media. Canada has sought to maintain domestically-owned media networks to support a distinctive Canadian analysis of political and social developments.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The most restrictive foreign ownership regulations have typically prevailed in media and cultural industries in which foreign ownership has often been limited to minority equity ownership. The rationales for these restrictions have been to prevent foreign influence through foreign ownership in these sensitive industries with high social and political impact. In some countries, the media have been an organ of the state used to carry out the mission of the government in power. Foreign investment in the media has been seen as diminishing this government regulatory power. In the Philippines, where the 1991 changes in the Foreign Investment Act swept away most sectoral restrictions, those on media were retained. As of 1994, The Republic of Korea had a total ban on foreign investment in mass media. Canada has sought to maintain domestically-owned media networks to support a distinctive Canadian analysis of political and social developments.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The most restrictive foreign ownership regulations have typically prevailed in media and cultural industries in which foreign ownership has often been limited to minority equity ownership. The rationales for these restrictions have been to prevent foreign influence through foreign ownership in these sensitive industries with high social and political impact. In some countries, the media have been an organ of the state used to carry out the mission of the government in power. Foreign investment in the media has been seen as diminishing this government regulatory power. In the Philippines, where the 1991 changes in the Foreign Investment Act swept away most sectoral restrictions, those on media were retained. As of 1994, The Republic of Korea had a total ban on foreign investment in mass media. Canada has sought to maintain domestically-owned media networks to support a distinctive Canadian analysis of political and social developments.

Key concepts: Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Media and cultural industries — Research Paper | ScholarLens