2003Unpublished venueRequires access

Weighting for China, Counting on the United States: Asia's China Debate and U.S. Interests

Satu P. Limaye

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract : Asian countries are according a rising China greater weight, but also waiting to see how China and its policies evolve. Within Asian countries and regionally, general agreement favors engaging China. Today s stakeholders of Asian countries China debate are more numerous complicating policymaking and implementation. Asian anxieties center on how China s increasing power will impinge on territorial and border disputes and sovereign prerogatives. Some worry persists about China s ability to sustain economic growth and political stability. Unease exists about ethnic Chinese migration and diasporas and the possible reassertion of China s historical dominance. The United States has a prime opportunity to influence Asia s China debate because the debate is ongoing, and the United States remains regarded as fundamental to national and regional calculations including about China. Extreme U.S.-China tensions and possible pressures by either to choose sides are unwelcome. No Asian country expects or desires China to supplant U.S. regional pre-eminence. At worst, some favor a balance of great powers or a multi-polar order. Having more stakeholders in Asia s China debate benefits the United States because Beijing has to work harder at making a coherent, consistent Asia policy and the United States can exploit inconsistencies. Asia s decisions on issues ranging from missile defenses to trade will consider Chinese positions, but for the foreseeable future are unlikely to be determined by them. Indeed, Asia s China debate might well evolve to facilitate closer ties to the United States.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract : Asian countries are according a rising China greater weight, but also waiting to see how China and its policies evolve. Within Asian countries and regionally, general agreement favors engaging China. Today s stakeholders of Asian countries China debate are more numerous complicating policymaking and implementation. Asian anxieties center on how China s increasing power will impinge on territorial and border disputes and sovereign prerogatives. Some worry persists about China s ability to sustain economic growth and political stability. Unease exists about ethnic Chinese migration and diasporas and the possible reassertion of China s historical dominance. The United States has a prime opportunity to influence Asia s China debate because the debate is ongoing, and the United States remains regarded as fundamental to national and regional calculations including about China. Extreme U.S.-China tensions and possible pressures by either to choose sides are unwelcome. No Asian country expects or desires China to supplant U.S. regional pre-eminence. At worst, some favor a balance of great powers or a multi-polar order. Having more stakeholders in Asia s China debate benefits the United States because Beijing has to work harder at making a coherent, consistent Asia policy and the United States can exploit inconsistencies. Asia s decisions on issues ranging from missile defenses to trade will consider Chinese positions, but for the foreseeable future are unlikely to be determined by them. Indeed, Asia s China debate might well evolve to facilitate closer ties to the United States.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract : Asian countries are according a rising China greater weight, but also waiting to see how China and its policies evolve. Within Asian countries and regionally, general agreement favors engaging China. Today s stakeholders of Asian countries China debate are more numerous complicating policymaking and implementation. Asian anxieties center on how China s increasing power will impinge on territorial and border disputes and sovereign prerogatives. Some worry persists about China s ability to sustain economic growth and political stability. Unease exists about ethnic Chinese migration and diasporas and the possible reassertion of China s historical dominance. The United States has a prime opportunity to influence Asia s China debate because the debate is ongoing, and the United States remains regarded as fundamental to national and regional calculations including about China. Extreme U.S.-China tensions and possible pressures by either to choose sides are unwelcome. No Asian country expects or desires China to supplant U.S. regional pre-eminence. At worst, some favor a balance of great powers or a multi-polar order. Having more stakeholders in Asia s China debate benefits the United States because Beijing has to work harder at making a coherent, consistent Asia policy and the United States can exploit inconsistencies. Asia s decisions on issues ranging from missile defenses to trade will consider Chinese positions, but for the foreseeable future are unlikely to be determined by them. Indeed, Asia s China debate might well evolve to facilitate closer ties to the United States.

Key concepts: China, Weighting, Political science, Geography, Law, Physics, Acoustics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Weighting for China, Counting on the United States: Asia's China Debate and U.S. Interests — Research Paper | ScholarLens