2019Orthodontics and Craniofacial ResearchRequires access

Relationships of maxillofacial morphology and malocclusion with handgrip strength in adult women

Shoko Nakagawa, Aya Maeda, Shouichi Miyawaki

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Maxillofacial morphology and malocclusion are related to maximum occlusal force (MOF). Although it has been reported that MOF was related to handgrip strength (HS), the relationships between maxillofacial morphology/malocclusion and HS remain unclear. This study aimed to examine the relationships between maxillofacial morphology, malocclusion and HS. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Eighty-five women with malocclusion, aged 18-40 years, were selected. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lateral cephalometric radiographs (SNA, SNB, ANB, mandibular plane-FH, and gonial angles, overjet and overbite), the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index and HS were measured. Subjects were classified by the Japanese normal mean value of cephalometric analysis or the reference value which was defined by degree of malocclusion in each PAR index measurement item (small/low: value < mean/reference value, large/high: value ≧ mean/reference value). Measurements were then compared between groups. RESULTS: HS of the large-gonial angle group was lower than that of the small-gonial angle group. In the small-overbite group or high-transverse (PAR index score showing crossbite/scissor bite in the canine and molars) group, HS in the large-gonial angle group was significantly lower than that in the small-gonial angle group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that gonial angle is the largest factor affecting HS. HS may be especially low in those subjects with a large gonial angle and a small overbite or a crossbite/scissor bite in the molar section.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: Maxillofacial morphology and malocclusion are related to maximum occlusal force (MOF). Although it has been reported that MOF was related to handgrip strength (HS), the relationships between maxillofacial morphology/malocclusion and HS remain unclear. This study aimed to examine the relationships between maxillofacial morphology, malocclusion and HS. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Eighty-five women with malocclusion, aged 18-40 years, were selected. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lateral cephalometric radiographs (SNA, SNB, ANB, mandibular plane-FH, and gonial angles, overjet and overbite), the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index and HS were measured. Subjects were classified by the Japanese normal mean value of cephalometric analysis or the reference value which was defined by degree of malocclusion in each PAR index measurement item (small/low: value < mean/reference value, large/high: value ≧ mean/reference value). Measurements were then compared between groups. RESULTS: HS of the large-gonial angle group was lower than that of the small-gonial angle group. In the small-overbite group or high-transverse (PAR index score showing crossbite/scissor bite in the canine and molars) group, HS in the large-gonial angle group was significantly lower than that in the small-gonial angle group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that gonial angle is the largest factor affecting HS. HS may be especially low in those subjects with a large gonial angle and a small overbite or a crossbite/scissor bite in the molar section.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: Maxillofacial morphology and malocclusion are related to maximum occlusal force (MOF). Although it has been reported that MOF was related to handgrip strength (HS), the relationships between maxillofacial morphology/malocclusion and HS remain unclear. This study aimed to examine the relationships between maxillofacial morphology, malocclusion and HS. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Eighty-five women with malocclusion, aged 18-40 years, were selected. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lateral cephalometric radiographs (SNA, SNB, ANB, mandibular plane-FH, and gonial angles, overjet and overbite), the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index and HS were measured. Subjects were classified by the Japanese normal mean value of cephalometric analysis or the reference value which was defined by degree of malocclusion in each PAR index measurement item (small/low: value < mean/reference value, large/high: value ≧ mean/reference value). Measurements were then compared between groups. RESULTS: HS of the large-gonial angle group was lower than that of the small-gonial angle group. In the small-overbite group or high-transverse (PAR index score showing crossbite/scissor bite in the canine and molars) group, HS in the large-gonial angle group was significantly lower than that in the small-gonial angle group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that gonial angle is the largest factor affecting HS. HS may be especially low in those subjects with a large gonial angle and a small overbite or a crossbite/scissor bite in the molar section.

Key concepts: Gonial angle, Overbite, Malocclusion, Crossbite, Overjet, Orthodontics, Medicine, Molar

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Relationships of maxillofacial morphology and malocclusion with handgrip strength in adult women — Research Paper | ScholarLens