The feasibility of inter-cropping pea with canola, mustard, and barley
L.E. Cowell, Chris van Kessel, N. J. Livingston
Abstract
Open-access reader
L.E. Cowell, Chris van Kessel, N. J. Livingston
Abstract
Open-access reader
An inter-cropping trial was conducted in the summer of 1988 to compare pea inter-crops with Tobin and Westar canola, yellow mustard, and barley. At two sites, a number of different pea varieties were inter-cropped with canola, mustard, and barley, and compared to mono-crops of each. At four sites, a seeding rate trial was conducted with Westar canola and barley inter-crops with Trapper pea. Measurements to assess the success of the inter-crop included grain yield, land equivalent ratio (LER), grain nitrogen yield, and economic return. In the variety trial, inter-cropping reduced the yields of both component crops, and the LER was not significantly higher than 1 in any case. There were significant differences in economic return for the crop. Inter-cropping did not increase the $/ha return, while pea mono-crops provided the greatest income. Significant differences in grain N yield were also observed, with pea varieties being highest. Little or no increase occurred in grain N yield when pea was inter-cropped with barley. In the seeding rate trial, inter-cropping again did not benefit yield nor economic return. Some benefit resulted from inter-cropping barley with pea, as this increased the grain N yield as compared to mono-cropped barley. Although neither yield nor economic return was consistently increased by inter-cropping, other benefits to the pea were noted. Lodging of pea was reduced, especially when inter-cropped with mustard or Westar canola. This could facilitate harvest, and reduce associated grain loss. In addition, the pea crop would be less subject to pre-harvest weather damage, thus producing a higher quality crop.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
An inter-cropping trial was conducted in the summer of 1988 to compare pea inter-crops with Tobin and Westar canola, yellow mustard, and barley. At two sites, a number of different pea varieties were inter-cropped with canola, mustard, and barley, and compared to mono-crops of each. At four sites, a seeding rate trial was conducted with Westar canola and barley inter-crops with Trapper pea. Measurements to assess the success of the inter-crop included grain yield, land equivalent ratio (LER), grain nitrogen yield, and economic return. In the variety trial, inter-cropping reduced the yields of both component crops, and the LER was not significantly higher than 1 in any case. There were significant differences in economic return for the crop. Inter-cropping did not increase the $/ha return, while pea mono-crops provided the greatest income. Significant differences in grain N yield were also observed, with pea varieties being highest. Little or no increase occurred in grain N yield when pea was inter-cropped with barley. In the seeding rate trial, inter-cropping again did not benefit yield nor economic return. Some benefit resulted from inter-cropping barley with pea, as this increased the grain N yield as compared to mono-cropped barley. Although neither yield nor economic return was consistently increased by inter-cropping, other benefits to the pea were noted. Lodging of pea was reduced, especially when inter-cropped with mustard or Westar canola. This could facilitate harvest, and reduce associated grain loss. In addition, the pea crop would be less subject to pre-harvest weather damage, thus producing a higher quality crop.
Key concepts: Canola, Agronomy, Cropping, Mustard seed, Biology, Agroforestry, Agriculture, Horticulture