2019•Cardiology and Cardiovascular ResearchOpen access

The Short-Term and Long-Term Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure Patients

Bin Zhang

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Objective to evaluate the short-term and long-term effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients. Methods We continuous assessed forty-eight heart failure patients who underwent CRT implantation in our hospital from January 2008 to December 2012, evaluate/measure NYHA grade, left ventricular diastolic diameter (LVEDd), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and B-type natriuretic peptides (BNP) before cardiac resynchronization therapy and half year, one year, two years after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Results Compared to the results before cardiac resynchronization, half year, one year and two years later, NYHA grade, LVEF, LVEDd, BNP improved significantly (P <0.05); Compared to the results of half year after cardiac resynchronization therapy, one year and two years later, NYHA grade, LVEF, LVEDd, BNP also improved significantly (P<0.05); However, compared the results between one year and two years later after cardiac resynchronization therapy, there were no difference as to NYHA grade, LVEF, LVEDd and BNP (P>0.05). Conclusions CRT could improve cardiac function in patients with congestive heart failure, however, when we followed up the patients for two years, cardiac function did not improve further.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective to evaluate the short-term and long-term effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients. Methods We continuous assessed forty-eight heart failure patients who underwent CRT implantation in our hospital from January 2008 to December 2012, evaluate/measure NYHA grade, left ventricular diastolic diameter (LVEDd), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and B-type natriuretic peptides (BNP) before cardiac resynchronization therapy and half year, one year, two years after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Results Compared to the results before cardiac resynchronization, half year, one year and two years later, NYHA grade, LVEF, LVEDd, BNP improved significantly (P <0.05); Compared to the results of half year after cardiac resynchronization therapy, one year and two years later, NYHA grade, LVEF, LVEDd, BNP also improved significantly (P<0.05); However, compared the results between one year and two years later after cardiac resynchronization therapy, there were no difference as to NYHA grade, LVEF, LVEDd and BNP (P>0.05). Conclusions CRT could improve cardiac function in patients with congestive heart failure, however, when we followed up the patients for two years, cardiac function did not improve further.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective to evaluate the short-term and long-term effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients. Methods We continuous assessed forty-eight heart failure patients who underwent CRT implantation in our hospital from January 2008 to December 2012, evaluate/measure NYHA grade, left ventricular diastolic diameter (LVEDd), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and B-type natriuretic peptides (BNP) before cardiac resynchronization therapy and half year, one year, two years after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Results Compared to the results before cardiac resynchronization, half year, one year and two years later, NYHA grade, LVEF, LVEDd, BNP improved significantly (P <0.05); Compared to the results of half year after cardiac resynchronization therapy, one year and two years later, NYHA grade, LVEF, LVEDd, BNP also improved significantly (P<0.05); However, compared the results between one year and two years later after cardiac resynchronization therapy, there were no difference as to NYHA grade, LVEF, LVEDd and BNP (P>0.05). Conclusions CRT could improve cardiac function in patients with congestive heart failure, however, when we followed up the patients for two years, cardiac function did not improve further.

Key concepts: Cardiac resynchronization therapy, Ejection fraction, Cardiology, Medicine, Heart failure, Internal medicine, Cardiac function curve

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Short-Term and Long-Term Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure Patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens