2019Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium)Open access

Analyzing False Positive Source Code Vulnerabilities Using Static Analysis Tools

Foteini Cheirdari, George Karabatis

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

Static source code analysis for the detection of vulnerabilities may generate a huge amount of results making it difficult to manually verify all of them. In addition, static code analysis yields a large number of false positives. Consequently, software developers may ignore the results of static code analysis. This paper analyzes the results of static code analysis tools to identify false positive trends per tool. The novel idea is to assist developers and analysts identify the likelihood of a finding to be an actual true positive. This paper proposes an algorithm that makes use of a new critical feature, a personal identifier, which assists labeling the findings correctly as true or false. Experiments verified identification of true positives with a higher level of accuracy.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Static source code analysis for the detection of vulnerabilities may generate a huge amount of results making it difficult to manually verify all of them. In addition, static code analysis yields a large number of false positives. Consequently, software developers may ignore the results of static code analysis. This paper analyzes the results of static code analysis tools to identify false positive trends per tool. The novel idea is to assist developers and analysts identify the likelihood of a finding to be an actual true positive. This paper proposes an algorithm that makes use of a new critical feature, a personal identifier, which assists labeling the findings correctly as true or false. Experiments verified identification of true positives with a higher level of accuracy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Static source code analysis for the detection of vulnerabilities may generate a huge amount of results making it difficult to manually verify all of them. In addition, static code analysis yields a large number of false positives. Consequently, software developers may ignore the results of static code analysis. This paper analyzes the results of static code analysis tools to identify false positive trends per tool. The novel idea is to assist developers and analysts identify the likelihood of a finding to be an actual true positive. This paper proposes an algorithm that makes use of a new critical feature, a personal identifier, which assists labeling the findings correctly as true or false. Experiments verified identification of true positives with a higher level of accuracy.

Key concepts: Static analysis, False positive paradox, Computer science, Static program analysis, Source code, Identifier, Identification (biology), Code (set theory)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analyzing False Positive Source Code Vulnerabilities Using Static Analysis Tools — Research Paper | ScholarLens