2018Unpublished venueRequires access

Inter-Rater and Intra-Rater Reliability of Quantitative Upper Limb Spasticity Evaluation based on Modified Ashworth Scale Tool

Asmarani Ahmad Puzi, Shahrul Na’im Sidek, Ismail Mohd Khairuddin, Hazlina Md Yusof, Hadi Mat Rosly

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Clinical assessments of muscle spasticity are done by physiotherapists with the help of assessment scales. The gold standard is by using Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), in which the scale quantifies the level of muscle spasticity by measuring resistance to passive movements. However, this scale is highly subjective to the assessors' opinions and experiences. Therefore, we proposed Muscle Spasticity Assessment System (MSAS) as an attempt to add objective weights to the current spasticity assessment method. In this study, inter-rater reliability of MSAS and its intra-rater reliability with MAS are presented. 46 subjects with neurological disorders participated in this study. Inter-rater reliability for clinical and MSAS assessment method gives substantial to excellent (Kappa value 0.82) and excellent (Kappa value 0.99) respectively. For both methods, intra-rater proved to give excellent result. MSAS are accurate and reliable in assisting the physiotherapist to quantify the spasticity of the upper limbs.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Clinical assessments of muscle spasticity are done by physiotherapists with the help of assessment scales. The gold standard is by using Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), in which the scale quantifies the level of muscle spasticity by measuring resistance to passive movements. However, this scale is highly subjective to the assessors' opinions and experiences. Therefore, we proposed Muscle Spasticity Assessment System (MSAS) as an attempt to add objective weights to the current spasticity assessment method. In this study, inter-rater reliability of MSAS and its intra-rater reliability with MAS are presented. 46 subjects with neurological disorders participated in this study. Inter-rater reliability for clinical and MSAS assessment method gives substantial to excellent (Kappa value 0.82) and excellent (Kappa value 0.99) respectively. For both methods, intra-rater proved to give excellent result. MSAS are accurate and reliable in assisting the physiotherapist to quantify the spasticity of the upper limbs.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Clinical assessments of muscle spasticity are done by physiotherapists with the help of assessment scales. The gold standard is by using Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), in which the scale quantifies the level of muscle spasticity by measuring resistance to passive movements. However, this scale is highly subjective to the assessors' opinions and experiences. Therefore, we proposed Muscle Spasticity Assessment System (MSAS) as an attempt to add objective weights to the current spasticity assessment method. In this study, inter-rater reliability of MSAS and its intra-rater reliability with MAS are presented. 46 subjects with neurological disorders participated in this study. Inter-rater reliability for clinical and MSAS assessment method gives substantial to excellent (Kappa value 0.82) and excellent (Kappa value 0.99) respectively. For both methods, intra-rater proved to give excellent result. MSAS are accurate and reliable in assisting the physiotherapist to quantify the spasticity of the upper limbs.

Key concepts: Spasticity, Modified Ashworth scale, Inter-rater reliability, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Reliability (semiconductor), Kappa, Physical therapy, Gold standard (test)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Inter-Rater and Intra-Rater Reliability of Quantitative Upper Limb Spasticity Evaluation based on Modified Ashworth Scale Tool — Research Paper | ScholarLens