2017Unpublished venueRequires access

Frankfurt Sociology: Theory of Society

W. Adorno Theodor, Torr Zoltán, Michael Landmann

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

By 1949, out of the postwar chaos, two Germanies emerged as separate political entities: the Federal Republic of Germany ( Bundesrepublik Deutschland ) and the German Democratic Republic ( Deutsche Demokratische Republik ). Ralf Dahrendorf describes the striking dissimilarity of the two states: "If one compares Frankfurt and Leipzig, Dusseldorf and Karl-Marx-Stadt, even East and West Berlin today, one is unlikely to conclude that these cities are all situated in the same country." In 1933 sociology was either exiled or had become part of the Nazi Weltanschauung. The Nazis hated and feared sociology, the science with the capacity to unmask social myths. This chapter presents the attempted codification of Critical Theory as sociology, under the new label, "Theory of Society," after Max Horkheimer&s;s and Theodor W. Adorno&s;s return to Frankfurt. It demonstrates the conceptual looseness of Frankfurt sociology and how it is manifested particularly by its proposition that the demarcation between art and science be blurred.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

By 1949, out of the postwar chaos, two Germanies emerged as separate political entities: the Federal Republic of Germany ( Bundesrepublik Deutschland ) and the German Democratic Republic ( Deutsche Demokratische Republik ). Ralf Dahrendorf describes the striking dissimilarity of the two states: "If one compares Frankfurt and Leipzig, Dusseldorf and Karl-Marx-Stadt, even East and West Berlin today, one is unlikely to conclude that these cities are all situated in the same country." In 1933 sociology was either exiled or had become part of the Nazi Weltanschauung. The Nazis hated and feared sociology, the science with the capacity to unmask social myths. This chapter presents the attempted codification of Critical Theory as sociology, under the new label, "Theory of Society," after Max Horkheimer&s;s and Theodor W. Adorno&s;s return to Frankfurt. It demonstrates the conceptual looseness of Frankfurt sociology and how it is manifested particularly by its proposition that the demarcation between art and science be blurred.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

By 1949, out of the postwar chaos, two Germanies emerged as separate political entities: the Federal Republic of Germany ( Bundesrepublik Deutschland ) and the German Democratic Republic ( Deutsche Demokratische Republik ). Ralf Dahrendorf describes the striking dissimilarity of the two states: "If one compares Frankfurt and Leipzig, Dusseldorf and Karl-Marx-Stadt, even East and West Berlin today, one is unlikely to conclude that these cities are all situated in the same country." In 1933 sociology was either exiled or had become part of the Nazi Weltanschauung. The Nazis hated and feared sociology, the science with the capacity to unmask social myths. This chapter presents the attempted codification of Critical Theory as sociology, under the new label, "Theory of Society," after Max Horkheimer&s;s and Theodor W. Adorno&s;s return to Frankfurt. It demonstrates the conceptual looseness of Frankfurt sociology and how it is manifested particularly by its proposition that the demarcation between art and science be blurred.

Key concepts: Sociology, Social science, Epistemology, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Frankfurt Sociology: Theory of Society — Research Paper | ScholarLens