2019Sleep MedicineOpen access

Mandibular advancement appliances for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yanyan Ma, Min Yu, Gao Xuemei

Open full text 57 citations

Abstract

The objective of this review was to evaluate the effect of mandibular advancement appliances (MAAs) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children. To this end, several electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library) were systematically searched until 18 June 2018. Randomized and non-randomized clinical trials were included. Articles of high-quality were included for the meta-analysis. Data extraction and quality assessment were conducted by two independent reviewers. Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three non-RCTs were finally included in the review; of these, two RCTs of high-quality were included in the meta-analysis. The mean difference in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) change for mandibular advancement group compared with control group was -1.75 events/h (95% confidence interval (CI) -2.07, -1.44), p < 0.00001. Sensitivity analysis including the quasi-randomized RCT and non-RCTs showed stable favorable results for MAAs. The meta-analysis showed supportive evidence for MAA treatment in pediatric OSA patients. Subgroup analysis suggested that MAA can be effective for mild to severe patients before the end of the pubertal peak. Long-term treatment (at least six months) may be more effective than short-term treatment.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The objective of this review was to evaluate the effect of mandibular advancement appliances (MAAs) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children. To this end, several electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library) were systematically searched until 18 June 2018. Randomized and non-randomized clinical trials were included. Articles of high-quality were included for the meta-analysis. Data extraction and quality assessment were conducted by two independent reviewers. Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three non-RCTs were finally included in the review; of these, two RCTs of high-quality were included in the meta-analysis. The mean difference in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) change for mandibular advancement group compared with control group was -1.75 events/h (95% confidence interval (CI) -2.07, -1.44), p < 0.00001. Sensitivity analysis including the quasi-randomized RCT and non-RCTs showed stable favorable results for MAAs. The meta-analysis showed supportive evidence for MAA treatment in pediatric OSA patients. Subgroup analysis suggested that MAA can be effective for mild to severe patients before the end of the pubertal peak. Long-term treatment (at least six months) may be more effective than short-term treatment.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 57 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The objective of this review was to evaluate the effect of mandibular advancement appliances (MAAs) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children. To this end, several electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library) were systematically searched until 18 June 2018. Randomized and non-randomized clinical trials were included. Articles of high-quality were included for the meta-analysis. Data extraction and quality assessment were conducted by two independent reviewers. Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three non-RCTs were finally included in the review; of these, two RCTs of high-quality were included in the meta-analysis. The mean difference in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) change for mandibular advancement group compared with control group was -1.75 events/h (95% confidence interval (CI) -2.07, -1.44), p < 0.00001. Sensitivity analysis including the quasi-randomized RCT and non-RCTs showed stable favorable results for MAAs. The meta-analysis showed supportive evidence for MAA treatment in pediatric OSA patients. Subgroup analysis suggested that MAA can be effective for mild to severe patients before the end of the pubertal peak. Long-term treatment (at least six months) may be more effective than short-term treatment.

Key concepts: Obstructive sleep apnea, Meta-analysis, Medicine, Sleep apnea, Sleep (system call), Dentistry, Orthodontics, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Mandibular advancement appliances for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens