2017•Indian Journal of Health Sciences and Biomedical Research (KLEU)Open access

Comparison and assessment of the oral hygiene status and user satisfaction of a novel toothbrush and a regular commercial toothbrush: A questionnaire study

Rishi Bhimani, Shaila Kothiwale

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

Background: Periodontal disease is the most prevalent diseases of the oral cavity. Etiology of periodontal diseases has been related to the dental plaque biofilm. Therefore, regular removal of dental plaque and prevention of its formation is essential to maintain optimum oral health. Plaque control measures have been broadly classified into - mechanical and chemical plaque control. Mechanical plaque control is a simple and effective tool for oral prophylaxis. Particularly, the daily use of a manual toothbrush with a toothpaste prevents oral diseases. A variety of toothbrush designs and configurations have been manufactured and evaluated for their efficacyAims: To design an ergonomic novel toothbrush and compare its efficacy of oral hygiene with a standard commercial toothbrush and to assess and compare the satisfaction and comfort of the toothbrushes among the study subjects, through a self-constructed questionnaire.Settings and Design: Questionnaire study.Materials and Methods: A total of 60 subjects, 18-25 years of age who reported to the Department of Periodontics, KLE's V.K Institute of Dental Sciences were selected, as per inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study. The toothbrushes were provided and were asked to use each toothbrush for 15 days. At the end of the study, subjects were asked to fill a self-constructed questionnaire consisting of 8 closed-ended questions pertaining to the comfort, grip, head design, bristle design, accessibility and cleaning efficiency of the toothbrushes.Statistical Analysis: Chi-square test.Results: Questionnaire revealed 92% favoured for neck design and flexibility, 77.18% better accessibility to posterior teeth, 70.18% bristle design, 75.44% improved removal lodged food and 71.93% preferred TB2 over TB1 for overall comfort and brushing experience.Conclusion: The responses of the questionnaire revealed better satisfaction, comfort and oral hygiene with novel toothbrush compared to the standard commercial toothbrush.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Periodontal disease is the most prevalent diseases of the oral cavity. Etiology of periodontal diseases has been related to the dental plaque biofilm. Therefore, regular removal of dental plaque and prevention of its formation is essential to maintain optimum oral health. Plaque control measures have been broadly classified into - mechanical and chemical plaque control. Mechanical plaque control is a simple and effective tool for oral prophylaxis. Particularly, the daily use of a manual toothbrush with a toothpaste prevents oral diseases. A variety of toothbrush designs and configurations have been manufactured and evaluated for their efficacyAims: To design an ergonomic novel toothbrush and compare its efficacy of oral hygiene with a standard commercial toothbrush and to assess and compare the satisfaction and comfort of the toothbrushes among the study subjects, through a self-constructed questionnaire.Settings and Design: Questionnaire study.Materials and Methods: A total of 60 subjects, 18-25 years of age who reported to the Department of Periodontics, KLE's V.K Institute of Dental Sciences were selected, as per inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study. The toothbrushes were provided and were asked to use each toothbrush for 15 days. At the end of the study, subjects were asked to fill a self-constructed questionnaire consisting of 8 closed-ended questions pertaining to the comfort, grip, head design, bristle design, accessibility and cleaning efficiency of the toothbrushes.Statistical Analysis: Chi-square test.Results: Questionnaire revealed 92% favoured for neck design and flexibility, 77.18% better accessibility to posterior teeth, 70.18% bristle design, 75.44% improved removal lodged food and 71.93% preferred TB2 over TB1 for overall comfort and brushing experience.Conclusion: The responses of the questionnaire revealed better satisfaction, comfort and oral hygiene with novel toothbrush compared to the standard commercial toothbrush.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Periodontal disease is the most prevalent diseases of the oral cavity. Etiology of periodontal diseases has been related to the dental plaque biofilm. Therefore, regular removal of dental plaque and prevention of its formation is essential to maintain optimum oral health. Plaque control measures have been broadly classified into - mechanical and chemical plaque control. Mechanical plaque control is a simple and effective tool for oral prophylaxis. Particularly, the daily use of a manual toothbrush with a toothpaste prevents oral diseases. A variety of toothbrush designs and configurations have been manufactured and evaluated for their efficacyAims: To design an ergonomic novel toothbrush and compare its efficacy of oral hygiene with a standard commercial toothbrush and to assess and compare the satisfaction and comfort of the toothbrushes among the study subjects, through a self-constructed questionnaire.Settings and Design: Questionnaire study.Materials and Methods: A total of 60 subjects, 18-25 years of age who reported to the Department of Periodontics, KLE's V.K Institute of Dental Sciences were selected, as per inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study. The toothbrushes were provided and were asked to use each toothbrush for 15 days. At the end of the study, subjects were asked to fill a self-constructed questionnaire consisting of 8 closed-ended questions pertaining to the comfort, grip, head design, bristle design, accessibility and cleaning efficiency of the toothbrushes.Statistical Analysis: Chi-square test.Results: Questionnaire revealed 92% favoured for neck design and flexibility, 77.18% better accessibility to posterior teeth, 70.18% bristle design, 75.44% improved removal lodged food and 71.93% preferred TB2 over TB1 for overall comfort and brushing experience.Conclusion: The responses of the questionnaire revealed better satisfaction, comfort and oral hygiene with novel toothbrush compared to the standard commercial toothbrush.

Key concepts: Toothbrush, Medicine, Dentistry, Oral hygiene, Interdental consonant, Toothpaste, Dental plaque, Periodontology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison and assessment of the oral hygiene status and user satisfaction of a novel toothbrush and a regular commercial toothbrush: A questionnaire study — Research Paper | ScholarLens