2019Australian Journal of OtolaryngologyOpen access

Can sleep questionnaires predict outcome in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy for sleep disordered breathing?

Benjamin C. Chan, Barbara C. Galland, Laurelle Smith, Sarah E. Maessen, Jill Haszard, Elizabeth Schaughency, Patrick Dawes

Open full text 9 citations

Abstract

Background: Paediatric sleep disordered breathing (SDB) affects 14% of children and is associated with adverse neurophysiological sequelae. Tonsillectomy +/− adenoidectomy (TA) is the most common first line treatment for SDB however objectively measuring outcome remains difficult. Polysomnography (PSG) is used to diagnose obstructive sleep apnoea, but is time consuming and difficult to access. This paper looks at the ability of sleep questionnaires to predict which children will benefit from TA for SDB as an alternative to PSG. Methods: A case-control study with children aged between 3 and 12 years placed on the surgical waiting list for TA secondary to SDB selected as the case group. Control participants consisted of children with no history of snoring. Forty-five children were included in the surgical group and 19 in the control. Both groups completed the sleep questionnaires OSA-18 and Paediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ), as well as overnight PSG, after which the intervention group had their intended surgery. Both questionnaires and PSG were repeated postoperatively and compared. Results: The surgical group had higher preoperative scores for all three tests than the control group [apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI): 2.5 vs. 0.7, difference (95% CI): 1.8 (1.0, 2.6), P<0.001; PSQ: 0.55 vs. 0.17, difference (95% CI): 0.38 (0.32, 0.45), P<0.001; OSA-18: 58 vs. 31, difference (95% CI): 27 (21, 33) P<0.001)]. Following surgery, scores in the surgical group all decreased [AHI (95% CI): −1.51 (−2.00, −1.02), P<0.001; PSQ (95% CI): −0.35 (−0.40, −0.30), P<0.001; OSA-18 (95% CI): −28 (−32, −33), P<0.001] but after adjusting for baseline score, only PSQ demonstrated a significant decrease in score following TA compared to controls [PSQ (95% CI): −0.14 (−0.24, −0.04), P<0.007; AHI (95% CI): 0.3 (−0.07, 0.66), P<0.106; OSA-18 (95% CI): −7 (−14, 0.5), P<0.069]. Children in the surgical group who scored less than the diagnostic cut off in PSQ showed no change in postoperative score. Conclusions: PSQ can be used to identify children with SDB who are likely to improve with TA, and of equal importance, those who are not.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Paediatric sleep disordered breathing (SDB) affects 14% of children and is associated with adverse neurophysiological sequelae. Tonsillectomy +/− adenoidectomy (TA) is the most common first line treatment for SDB however objectively measuring outcome remains difficult. Polysomnography (PSG) is used to diagnose obstructive sleep apnoea, but is time consuming and difficult to access. This paper looks at the ability of sleep questionnaires to predict which children will benefit from TA for SDB as an alternative to PSG. Methods: A case-control study with children aged between 3 and 12 years placed on the surgical waiting list for TA secondary to SDB selected as the case group. Control participants consisted of children with no history of snoring. Forty-five children were included in the surgical group and 19 in the control. Both groups completed the sleep questionnaires OSA-18 and Paediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ), as well as overnight PSG, after which the intervention group had their intended surgery. Both questionnaires and PSG were repeated postoperatively and compared. Results: The surgical group had higher preoperative scores for all three tests than the control group [apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI): 2.5 vs. 0.7, difference (95% CI): 1.8 (1.0, 2.6), P<0.001; PSQ: 0.55 vs. 0.17, difference (95% CI): 0.38 (0.32, 0.45), P<0.001; OSA-18: 58 vs. 31, difference (95% CI): 27 (21, 33) P<0.001)]. Following surgery, scores in the surgical group all decreased [AHI (95% CI): −1.51 (−2.00, −1.02), P<0.001; PSQ (95% CI): −0.35 (−0.40, −0.30), P<0.001; OSA-18 (95% CI): −28 (−32, −33), P<0.001] but after adjusting for baseline score, only PSQ demonstrated a significant decrease in score following TA compared to controls [PSQ (95% CI): −0.14 (−0.24, −0.04), P<0.007; AHI (95% CI): 0.3 (−0.07, 0.66), P<0.106; OSA-18 (95% CI): −7 (−14, 0.5), P<0.069]. Children in the surgical group who scored less than the diagnostic cut off in PSQ showed no change in postoperative score. Conclusions: PSQ can be used to identify children with SDB who are likely to improve with TA, and of equal importance, those who are not.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Paediatric sleep disordered breathing (SDB) affects 14% of children and is associated with adverse neurophysiological sequelae. Tonsillectomy +/− adenoidectomy (TA) is the most common first line treatment for SDB however objectively measuring outcome remains difficult. Polysomnography (PSG) is used to diagnose obstructive sleep apnoea, but is time consuming and difficult to access. This paper looks at the ability of sleep questionnaires to predict which children will benefit from TA for SDB as an alternative to PSG. Methods: A case-control study with children aged between 3 and 12 years placed on the surgical waiting list for TA secondary to SDB selected as the case group. Control participants consisted of children with no history of snoring. Forty-five children were included in the surgical group and 19 in the control. Both groups completed the sleep questionnaires OSA-18 and Paediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ), as well as overnight PSG, after which the intervention group had their intended surgery. Both questionnaires and PSG were repeated postoperatively and compared. Results: The surgical group had higher preoperative scores for all three tests than the control group [apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI): 2.5 vs. 0.7, difference (95% CI): 1.8 (1.0, 2.6), P<0.001; PSQ: 0.55 vs. 0.17, difference (95% CI): 0.38 (0.32, 0.45), P<0.001; OSA-18: 58 vs. 31, difference (95% CI): 27 (21, 33) P<0.001)]. Following surgery, scores in the surgical group all decreased [AHI (95% CI): −1.51 (−2.00, −1.02), P<0.001; PSQ (95% CI): −0.35 (−0.40, −0.30), P<0.001; OSA-18 (95% CI): −28 (−32, −33), P<0.001] but after adjusting for baseline score, only PSQ demonstrated a significant decrease in score following TA compared to controls [PSQ (95% CI): −0.14 (−0.24, −0.04), P<0.007; AHI (95% CI): 0.3 (−0.07, 0.66), P<0.106; OSA-18 (95% CI): −7 (−14, 0.5), P<0.069]. Children in the surgical group who scored less than the diagnostic cut off in PSQ showed no change in postoperative score. Conclusions: PSQ can be used to identify children with SDB who are likely to improve with TA, and of equal importance, those who are not.

Key concepts: Adenoidectomy, Medicine, Tonsillectomy, Polysomnography, Sleep disordered breathing, Breathing, Sleep (system call), Pediatrics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Can sleep questionnaires predict outcome in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy for sleep disordered breathing? — Research Paper | ScholarLens