Molar mass distribution by size exclusion chromatography: Comparison of multi‐angle light scattering and universal calibration
Štěpán Podzimek
Abstract
Štěpán Podzimek
Abstract
ABSTRACT Series of polymers of various molar mass, chemical composition, and molecular architecture was analyzed by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) coupled with a multi‐angle light scattering (MALS) photometer and an online viscometer. The molar mass averages were determined from the signal of MALS or calculated from the intrinsic viscosity and universal calibration. The comparison of the obtained results showed significant differences between the two methods. The MALS detection was shown to be more accurate for the determination of the weight‐average molar mass and less vulnerable to the spreading of polymer peak by band broadening. The universal calibration can yield more accurate estimation of the number‐average molar mass of branched polymers. It is also significantly more accurate for the characterization of fluorescent polymers than MALS with a regular laser of 660 nm. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 47561.
OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
ABSTRACT Series of polymers of various molar mass, chemical composition, and molecular architecture was analyzed by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) coupled with a multi‐angle light scattering (MALS) photometer and an online viscometer. The molar mass averages were determined from the signal of MALS or calculated from the intrinsic viscosity and universal calibration. The comparison of the obtained results showed significant differences between the two methods. The MALS detection was shown to be more accurate for the determination of the weight‐average molar mass and less vulnerable to the spreading of polymer peak by band broadening. The universal calibration can yield more accurate estimation of the number‐average molar mass of branched polymers. It is also significantly more accurate for the characterization of fluorescent polymers than MALS with a regular laser of 660 nm. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 47561.
Key concepts: Molar mass, Size-exclusion chromatography, Molar mass distribution, Polymer, Viscometer, Gel permeation chromatography, Intrinsic viscosity, Light scattering