2019•Journal of Applied Polymer ScienceOpen access

Molar mass distribution by size exclusion chromatography: Comparison of multi‐angle light scattering and universal calibration

Štěpán Podzimek

Open full text 20 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Series of polymers of various molar mass, chemical composition, and molecular architecture was analyzed by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) coupled with a multi‐angle light scattering (MALS) photometer and an online viscometer. The molar mass averages were determined from the signal of MALS or calculated from the intrinsic viscosity and universal calibration. The comparison of the obtained results showed significant differences between the two methods. The MALS detection was shown to be more accurate for the determination of the weight‐average molar mass and less vulnerable to the spreading of polymer peak by band broadening. The universal calibration can yield more accurate estimation of the number‐average molar mass of branched polymers. It is also significantly more accurate for the characterization of fluorescent polymers than MALS with a regular laser of 660 nm. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 47561.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT Series of polymers of various molar mass, chemical composition, and molecular architecture was analyzed by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) coupled with a multi‐angle light scattering (MALS) photometer and an online viscometer. The molar mass averages were determined from the signal of MALS or calculated from the intrinsic viscosity and universal calibration. The comparison of the obtained results showed significant differences between the two methods. The MALS detection was shown to be more accurate for the determination of the weight‐average molar mass and less vulnerable to the spreading of polymer peak by band broadening. The universal calibration can yield more accurate estimation of the number‐average molar mass of branched polymers. It is also significantly more accurate for the characterization of fluorescent polymers than MALS with a regular laser of 660 nm. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 47561.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT Series of polymers of various molar mass, chemical composition, and molecular architecture was analyzed by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) coupled with a multi‐angle light scattering (MALS) photometer and an online viscometer. The molar mass averages were determined from the signal of MALS or calculated from the intrinsic viscosity and universal calibration. The comparison of the obtained results showed significant differences between the two methods. The MALS detection was shown to be more accurate for the determination of the weight‐average molar mass and less vulnerable to the spreading of polymer peak by band broadening. The universal calibration can yield more accurate estimation of the number‐average molar mass of branched polymers. It is also significantly more accurate for the characterization of fluorescent polymers than MALS with a regular laser of 660 nm. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 47561.

Key concepts: Molar mass, Size-exclusion chromatography, Molar mass distribution, Polymer, Viscometer, Gel permeation chromatography, Intrinsic viscosity, Light scattering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Molar mass distribution by size exclusion chromatography: Comparison of multi‐angle light scattering and universal calibration — Research Paper | ScholarLens