2019•Psychological AssessmentRequires access

Using ecological momentary assessments to evaluate extant measures of mind wandering.

Dragana Ostojic‐Aitkens, Brianne A. Brooker, Carlin J. Miller

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

Mind wandering is a commonly experienced phenomenon. Although self-report measures are available to assess these attentional lapses, examination of their correspondence with the reported frequency of these episodes in daily life is warranted. Using ecological momentary assessments (EMAs), the present study aimed to validate 3 mind-wandering measures: the Mind-Wandering Questionnaire (MWQ) and the Mind Wandering-Spontaneous (MW-S) and Mind Wandering-Deliberate (MW-D) measures in university students (N = 100). Participants completed a series of questionnaires in an in-lab session. Using time-based EMA sampling, participants received 6 prompts via text message daily for 7 days. Each prompt asked students to report if their current thoughts were about something other than what they were doing using a scale ranging from completely on-task to completely on unrelated concerns. Self-report data collected via EMA indicated that reporting more mind-wandering episodes was associated with higher MWQ and MW-S scores but was not significantly correlated with the MW-D score. Results highlight the utility of EMA in validating measures designed to capture mind-wandering episodes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Mind wandering is a commonly experienced phenomenon. Although self-report measures are available to assess these attentional lapses, examination of their correspondence with the reported frequency of these episodes in daily life is warranted. Using ecological momentary assessments (EMAs), the present study aimed to validate 3 mind-wandering measures: the Mind-Wandering Questionnaire (MWQ) and the Mind Wandering-Spontaneous (MW-S) and Mind Wandering-Deliberate (MW-D) measures in university students (N = 100). Participants completed a series of questionnaires in an in-lab session. Using time-based EMA sampling, participants received 6 prompts via text message daily for 7 days. Each prompt asked students to report if their current thoughts were about something other than what they were doing using a scale ranging from completely on-task to completely on unrelated concerns. Self-report data collected via EMA indicated that reporting more mind-wandering episodes was associated with higher MWQ and MW-S scores but was not significantly correlated with the MW-D score. Results highlight the utility of EMA in validating measures designed to capture mind-wandering episodes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Mind wandering is a commonly experienced phenomenon. Although self-report measures are available to assess these attentional lapses, examination of their correspondence with the reported frequency of these episodes in daily life is warranted. Using ecological momentary assessments (EMAs), the present study aimed to validate 3 mind-wandering measures: the Mind-Wandering Questionnaire (MWQ) and the Mind Wandering-Spontaneous (MW-S) and Mind Wandering-Deliberate (MW-D) measures in university students (N = 100). Participants completed a series of questionnaires in an in-lab session. Using time-based EMA sampling, participants received 6 prompts via text message daily for 7 days. Each prompt asked students to report if their current thoughts were about something other than what they were doing using a scale ranging from completely on-task to completely on unrelated concerns. Self-report data collected via EMA indicated that reporting more mind-wandering episodes was associated with higher MWQ and MW-S scores but was not significantly correlated with the MW-D score. Results highlight the utility of EMA in validating measures designed to capture mind-wandering episodes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Key concepts: Mind-wandering, PsycINFO, Psychology, Experience sampling method, Ecological validity, Extant taxon, Task (project management), Developmental psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Using ecological momentary assessments to evaluate extant measures of mind wandering. — Research Paper | ScholarLens