Data As Counter-Performance: A New Way Forward or a Step Back for the Fundamental Right of Data Protection?
Laura Drechsler
Abstract
Laura Drechsler
Abstract
With the proposed Directive on digital content the Commission has tried to give legal re-ality to the fact that individuals pay for otherwise free services online with their per-sonal data (data as counter-performance). The legislative procedure has revealed se-vere doubts on the compatibility of this concept with the GDPR and the fundamental rights nature of data protection. This paper aims for reconciliation by considering the Directive as another means of data protection as a fundamental right, and by arguing for the enhanced practical opportunities using EU consumer law can offer.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
With the proposed Directive on digital content the Commission has tried to give legal re-ality to the fact that individuals pay for otherwise free services online with their per-sonal data (data as counter-performance). The legislative procedure has revealed se-vere doubts on the compatibility of this concept with the GDPR and the fundamental rights nature of data protection. This paper aims for reconciliation by considering the Directive as another means of data protection as a fundamental right, and by arguing for the enhanced practical opportunities using EU consumer law can offer.
Key concepts: Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communications, Data Protection Act 1998, Directive, General Data Protection Regulation, Fundamental rights, Commission, Data Protection Directive, Legislature