2019Psychology Press eBooksRequires access

A Performance Theory of Peer Relations

Brian Sutton‐Smith

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

The essentially child saving point of view is illustrated in the continuing reviews of this field by W. W. Hartup, in which he sets forth values of peerhood for society. Since children give the greater part of their own free time together to play and games, it would seem that focusing on those might give us a new and privileged access to what their world means to themselves. In 19th century anthropology it was the habit to see children’s play constructions as strictly imitative. The overarching assumption of educators and child psychologists for the past 100 years has been that children learn in diverse ways, and that their learning can be organized for the good of society. Although modem attention is to the intricacies of the peer group, their roles, their cohesiveness, popularity, attachment, aggression, friendships and cooperation these structural concerns are usually combined with a concern for function in an adultcentric sense.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The essentially child saving point of view is illustrated in the continuing reviews of this field by W. W. Hartup, in which he sets forth values of peerhood for society. Since children give the greater part of their own free time together to play and games, it would seem that focusing on those might give us a new and privileged access to what their world means to themselves. In 19th century anthropology it was the habit to see children’s play constructions as strictly imitative. The overarching assumption of educators and child psychologists for the past 100 years has been that children learn in diverse ways, and that their learning can be organized for the good of society. Although modem attention is to the intricacies of the peer group, their roles, their cohesiveness, popularity, attachment, aggression, friendships and cooperation these structural concerns are usually combined with a concern for function in an adultcentric sense.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The essentially child saving point of view is illustrated in the continuing reviews of this field by W. W. Hartup, in which he sets forth values of peerhood for society. Since children give the greater part of their own free time together to play and games, it would seem that focusing on those might give us a new and privileged access to what their world means to themselves. In 19th century anthropology it was the habit to see children’s play constructions as strictly imitative. The overarching assumption of educators and child psychologists for the past 100 years has been that children learn in diverse ways, and that their learning can be organized for the good of society. Although modem attention is to the intricacies of the peer group, their roles, their cohesiveness, popularity, attachment, aggression, friendships and cooperation these structural concerns are usually combined with a concern for function in an adultcentric sense.

Key concepts: Psychology, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Performance Theory of Peer Relations — Research Paper | ScholarLens