2019•German Studies ReviewRequires access

Nonsimultaneity and its Corrective: Thomas Brussig's Ambiguous Engagement with Reunification

John David Pizer

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

After briefly summarizing literary engagements with reunification by leading German authors who take clear sides on the issue of whether it was a positive development, I analyze two novels by Thomas Brussig, Wie es leuchtet and Das gibts in keinem Russenfilm. Based on these novels, I argue that Brussig's attitude toward reunification is highly ambivalent. Drawing on Ernst Bloch's concept of nonsimultaneity, which articulates how atavistic modes of precapitalistic life among various classes triggered by war and financial crises come to the surface in 1930s Germany, I show how leuchtet illuminates similar disruptions and distorted relationships during the Wende caused by reunification's abruptness. Such nonsimultaneities are canceled in Russenfilm because the novel cancels reunification itself.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

After briefly summarizing literary engagements with reunification by leading German authors who take clear sides on the issue of whether it was a positive development, I analyze two novels by Thomas Brussig, Wie es leuchtet and Das gibts in keinem Russenfilm. Based on these novels, I argue that Brussig's attitude toward reunification is highly ambivalent. Drawing on Ernst Bloch's concept of nonsimultaneity, which articulates how atavistic modes of precapitalistic life among various classes triggered by war and financial crises come to the surface in 1930s Germany, I show how leuchtet illuminates similar disruptions and distorted relationships during the Wende caused by reunification's abruptness. Such nonsimultaneities are canceled in Russenfilm because the novel cancels reunification itself.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

After briefly summarizing literary engagements with reunification by leading German authors who take clear sides on the issue of whether it was a positive development, I analyze two novels by Thomas Brussig, Wie es leuchtet and Das gibts in keinem Russenfilm. Based on these novels, I argue that Brussig's attitude toward reunification is highly ambivalent. Drawing on Ernst Bloch's concept of nonsimultaneity, which articulates how atavistic modes of precapitalistic life among various classes triggered by war and financial crises come to the surface in 1930s Germany, I show how leuchtet illuminates similar disruptions and distorted relationships during the Wende caused by reunification's abruptness. Such nonsimultaneities are canceled in Russenfilm because the novel cancels reunification itself.

Key concepts: German reunification, Ambivalence, Family reunification, German, History, Psychoanalysis, Aesthetics, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Nonsimultaneity and its Corrective: Thomas Brussig's Ambiguous Engagement with Reunification — Research Paper | ScholarLens