2010Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)Open access

Voiced obstruents in L2 French: the case of Swiss German learners

Stephan Schmid

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

The phonemic inventory of French coherently exploits the contrast between voiced and unvoiced obstruents. This opposition is distinctive in almost all phonotactic contexts, with two exceptions: i) /z/ does not occur word-initially; ii) the feature [±voice] may be assimilated in accordance with a following obstruent. Quite a different system is found in Swiss German dialects, where pairs of obstruents sharing the same place and manner of articulation are not differentiated through the presence/absence of laryngeal activity, but rather in terms of longer or shorter duration; such an opposition is maintained even word-finally, though some kind of postlexical fortition does occur if two obstruents follow each other. Therefore, one may predict that Swiss German learners will find major difficulties in realizing French voiced obstruents before other obstruents, whereas they might be more prone to achieve voicing in intervocalic contexts. All in all, these hypotheses are confirmed by the acoustic analysis of a corpus of read speech: the overall degree of voicing in the whole data only amounts to 46%; intervocalically, 68% of the obstruents were voiced, whereas in the prepausal position the subjects only obtained a degree of voicing of 6%.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The phonemic inventory of French coherently exploits the contrast between voiced and unvoiced obstruents. This opposition is distinctive in almost all phonotactic contexts, with two exceptions: i) /z/ does not occur word-initially; ii) the feature [±voice] may be assimilated in accordance with a following obstruent. Quite a different system is found in Swiss German dialects, where pairs of obstruents sharing the same place and manner of articulation are not differentiated through the presence/absence of laryngeal activity, but rather in terms of longer or shorter duration; such an opposition is maintained even word-finally, though some kind of postlexical fortition does occur if two obstruents follow each other. Therefore, one may predict that Swiss German learners will find major difficulties in realizing French voiced obstruents before other obstruents, whereas they might be more prone to achieve voicing in intervocalic contexts. All in all, these hypotheses are confirmed by the acoustic analysis of a corpus of read speech: the overall degree of voicing in the whole data only amounts to 46%; intervocalically, 68% of the obstruents were voiced, whereas in the prepausal position the subjects only obtained a degree of voicing of 6%.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The phonemic inventory of French coherently exploits the contrast between voiced and unvoiced obstruents. This opposition is distinctive in almost all phonotactic contexts, with two exceptions: i) /z/ does not occur word-initially; ii) the feature [±voice] may be assimilated in accordance with a following obstruent. Quite a different system is found in Swiss German dialects, where pairs of obstruents sharing the same place and manner of articulation are not differentiated through the presence/absence of laryngeal activity, but rather in terms of longer or shorter duration; such an opposition is maintained even word-finally, though some kind of postlexical fortition does occur if two obstruents follow each other. Therefore, one may predict that Swiss German learners will find major difficulties in realizing French voiced obstruents before other obstruents, whereas they might be more prone to achieve voicing in intervocalic contexts. All in all, these hypotheses are confirmed by the acoustic analysis of a corpus of read speech: the overall degree of voicing in the whole data only amounts to 46%; intervocalically, 68% of the obstruents were voiced, whereas in the prepausal position the subjects only obtained a degree of voicing of 6%.

Key concepts: Obstruent, Voice, German, Linguistics, Voice-onset time, Place of articulation, Psychology, Speech recognition

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Voiced obstruents in L2 French: the case of Swiss German learners — Research Paper | ScholarLens