Random and systematic errors of measurement
Colin Cooper
Abstract
Colin Cooper
Abstract
This chapter argues that computing a total score for each person by adding together scores on several items should show a large correlation with the true score because all of the random errors will tend to cancel out. Memory may also be a problem for personality scales and if the test content is interesting or unusual and is thus processed deeply on the first administration. Problems arise if people&s;s levels of a trait change between two administrations of a scale. In order to measure states, other methods would need to be devised, as the test-retest reliability of a state should be close to zero. Like any other form of reliability, test-retest reliability will vary depending on who is being assessed and why. It is possible for systematic errors of measurement to creep into any scale measuring personality, mood, emotion or attitudes. Systematic measurement errors, such as social desirability and acquiescence, can also add &s;noise&s; to scores on psychological scales.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This chapter argues that computing a total score for each person by adding together scores on several items should show a large correlation with the true score because all of the random errors will tend to cancel out. Memory may also be a problem for personality scales and if the test content is interesting or unusual and is thus processed deeply on the first administration. Problems arise if people&s;s levels of a trait change between two administrations of a scale. In order to measure states, other methods would need to be devised, as the test-retest reliability of a state should be close to zero. Like any other form of reliability, test-retest reliability will vary depending on who is being assessed and why. It is possible for systematic errors of measurement to creep into any scale measuring personality, mood, emotion or attitudes. Systematic measurement errors, such as social desirability and acquiescence, can also add &s;noise&s; to scores on psychological scales.
Key concepts: Random error, Systematic error, Computer science, Mathematics, Statistics