2018Unpublished venueOpen access

Pelagic longline fishery for albacore tuna ( Thunnus alalunga) yellowfin tuna ( Thunnus albacares ) and bigeye tuna ( Thunnus obesus ) in the high seas of eastern Pacific ocean.

Nyatchouba Nsangue Bruno Thierry, Cheng Zhou, Liuxiong Xu, Richard Kindong

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

This study highlighted the occurrence of a pelagic long line fishery targeting albacore tuna, yellowfin tuna and bigeye tuna in the high seas of eastern Pacific Ocean. Species selectivity of the fishing method was assessed. Hook depth, statistics of at-vessel survival rate grouped by hooks number, length frequency, weight frequency, length weight relationship, relative condition factor and Fulton’s condition factor were estimated for the target species. This fishing method proved highly selective for albacore tuna, where catches accounted for about 85% of catches, while other resources such as yellowfin tuna amounted to 4.8% and big eye tuna accounted for 9.70%. The results showed that, fish size increased with deeper depths. Hook No. 8 located at a critical depth indicated that fork lengths of tuna registered above this depth were significantly smaller than that those captured below it. Logistic regression model suggested a significant effect of hook depth on the catch efficiency. The highest density of catch efficiency was located at the depth of 167.57 m. An alternative strategy showed that hooks deployed at the depths ranging from 124 to 211 m will result in a more considerable fishing efficiency. The analyses also showed that the relative condition factors (Krel) of the three fish species were greater than (1) implying that they were in good physiological condition at the time of capture.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study highlighted the occurrence of a pelagic long line fishery targeting albacore tuna, yellowfin tuna and bigeye tuna in the high seas of eastern Pacific Ocean. Species selectivity of the fishing method was assessed. Hook depth, statistics of at-vessel survival rate grouped by hooks number, length frequency, weight frequency, length weight relationship, relative condition factor and Fulton’s condition factor were estimated for the target species. This fishing method proved highly selective for albacore tuna, where catches accounted for about 85% of catches, while other resources such as yellowfin tuna amounted to 4.8% and big eye tuna accounted for 9.70%. The results showed that, fish size increased with deeper depths. Hook No. 8 located at a critical depth indicated that fork lengths of tuna registered above this depth were significantly smaller than that those captured below it. Logistic regression model suggested a significant effect of hook depth on the catch efficiency. The highest density of catch efficiency was located at the depth of 167.57 m. An alternative strategy showed that hooks deployed at the depths ranging from 124 to 211 m will result in a more considerable fishing efficiency. The analyses also showed that the relative condition factors (Krel) of the three fish species were greater than (1) implying that they were in good physiological condition at the time of capture.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study highlighted the occurrence of a pelagic long line fishery targeting albacore tuna, yellowfin tuna and bigeye tuna in the high seas of eastern Pacific Ocean. Species selectivity of the fishing method was assessed. Hook depth, statistics of at-vessel survival rate grouped by hooks number, length frequency, weight frequency, length weight relationship, relative condition factor and Fulton’s condition factor were estimated for the target species. This fishing method proved highly selective for albacore tuna, where catches accounted for about 85% of catches, while other resources such as yellowfin tuna amounted to 4.8% and big eye tuna accounted for 9.70%. The results showed that, fish size increased with deeper depths. Hook No. 8 located at a critical depth indicated that fork lengths of tuna registered above this depth were significantly smaller than that those captured below it. Logistic regression model suggested a significant effect of hook depth on the catch efficiency. The highest density of catch efficiency was located at the depth of 167.57 m. An alternative strategy showed that hooks deployed at the depths ranging from 124 to 211 m will result in a more considerable fishing efficiency. The analyses also showed that the relative condition factors (Krel) of the three fish species were greater than (1) implying that they were in good physiological condition at the time of capture.

Key concepts: Albacore, Yellowfin tuna, Thunnus, Tuna, Fishery, Pelagic zone, Fish measurement, Fishing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Pelagic longline fishery for albacore tuna ( Thunnus alalunga) yellowfin tuna ( Thunnus albacares ) and bigeye tuna ( Thunnus obesus ) in the high seas of eastern Pacific ocean. — Research Paper | ScholarLens