2019Unpublished venueRequires access

Organizational Incentive Systems

David Knoke

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Typical American associations seem to hold eclectic interests, contrary to some images of “single issue” organizations. This chapter presents a descriptive overview of the organization and membership samples. It shows the range of variation in some of the major explanatory variables. These measures—organization size, administrative structure, goals, and environments—frequently serve as independent or control variables in the theoretical analyses. The American national association population is so heterogeneous, some simple comparisons are made across the four main sub-populations defined by the sampling design: trade associations, professional societies, labor unions, and recreational groups. The National Association Study used a two-stage sampling design to draw representative samples of 459 collective action organizations from the population of 13,000 national associations, and 8746 members from 35 professional, recreational, and women’s organizations. Organization theorists variously view bureaucracy as a rational structure or as a symbolic form, but the implications for resource management are similar.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Typical American associations seem to hold eclectic interests, contrary to some images of “single issue” organizations. This chapter presents a descriptive overview of the organization and membership samples. It shows the range of variation in some of the major explanatory variables. These measures—organization size, administrative structure, goals, and environments—frequently serve as independent or control variables in the theoretical analyses. The American national association population is so heterogeneous, some simple comparisons are made across the four main sub-populations defined by the sampling design: trade associations, professional societies, labor unions, and recreational groups. The National Association Study used a two-stage sampling design to draw representative samples of 459 collective action organizations from the population of 13,000 national associations, and 8746 members from 35 professional, recreational, and women’s organizations. Organization theorists variously view bureaucracy as a rational structure or as a symbolic form, but the implications for resource management are similar.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Typical American associations seem to hold eclectic interests, contrary to some images of “single issue” organizations. This chapter presents a descriptive overview of the organization and membership samples. It shows the range of variation in some of the major explanatory variables. These measures—organization size, administrative structure, goals, and environments—frequently serve as independent or control variables in the theoretical analyses. The American national association population is so heterogeneous, some simple comparisons are made across the four main sub-populations defined by the sampling design: trade associations, professional societies, labor unions, and recreational groups. The National Association Study used a two-stage sampling design to draw representative samples of 459 collective action organizations from the population of 13,000 national associations, and 8746 members from 35 professional, recreational, and women’s organizations. Organization theorists variously view bureaucracy as a rational structure or as a symbolic form, but the implications for resource management are similar.

Key concepts: Incentive, Business, Knowledge management, Computer science, Microeconomics, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Organizational Incentive Systems — Research Paper | ScholarLens