2013Unpublished venueRequires access

Pure Intuition and Kant's Synthetic A Priori

Emily Carson

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The chapter discusses the account of construction in pure intuition that allows Immanuel Kant to give a more detailed answer to the three open questions about mathematical knowledge from the Prize Essay. It traces the development of Kant&s;s views about mathematical cognition in order to outline the broader metaphysical and epistemological issues about mathematics that also contributed to the development of Kant&s;s Critical philosophy. It explains how Kant addresses these issues by analyzing the conditions of possible experience. The publication of the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant entered into a debate over the relative claims to truth of mathematics and metaphysics. Kant&s;s general project in the Critique of Pure Reason is to explain the possibility of synthetic a priori cognition. The doctrine of pure intuition allows Kant to distinguish his claim that geometry is necessarily true and applicable to the world from the metaphysicians&s; claim that it is "an empty delusion of the imagination".

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The chapter discusses the account of construction in pure intuition that allows Immanuel Kant to give a more detailed answer to the three open questions about mathematical knowledge from the Prize Essay. It traces the development of Kant&s;s views about mathematical cognition in order to outline the broader metaphysical and epistemological issues about mathematics that also contributed to the development of Kant&s;s Critical philosophy. It explains how Kant addresses these issues by analyzing the conditions of possible experience. The publication of the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant entered into a debate over the relative claims to truth of mathematics and metaphysics. Kant&s;s general project in the Critique of Pure Reason is to explain the possibility of synthetic a priori cognition. The doctrine of pure intuition allows Kant to distinguish his claim that geometry is necessarily true and applicable to the world from the metaphysicians&s; claim that it is "an empty delusion of the imagination".

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The chapter discusses the account of construction in pure intuition that allows Immanuel Kant to give a more detailed answer to the three open questions about mathematical knowledge from the Prize Essay. It traces the development of Kant&s;s views about mathematical cognition in order to outline the broader metaphysical and epistemological issues about mathematics that also contributed to the development of Kant&s;s Critical philosophy. It explains how Kant addresses these issues by analyzing the conditions of possible experience. The publication of the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant entered into a debate over the relative claims to truth of mathematics and metaphysics. Kant&s;s general project in the Critique of Pure Reason is to explain the possibility of synthetic a priori cognition. The doctrine of pure intuition allows Kant to distinguish his claim that geometry is necessarily true and applicable to the world from the metaphysicians&s; claim that it is "an empty delusion of the imagination".

Key concepts: A priori and a posteriori, Intuition, Philosophy, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Pure Intuition and Kant's Synthetic A Priori — Research Paper | ScholarLens