Trial Juries and the New Rules--Right to Trial by Jury
James R. Richardson
Abstract
Open-access reader
James R. Richardson
Abstract
Open-access reader
2 Ky.Const.sec.242.3 Ky.Const.sec.7. The "ancient mode of trial by jury" means trial by jury according to the common law.Branham v. Comm., 209 Ky.734, 273 S.W. 489 (1925).The essentials of such mode are that one be tried in a court presided over by a judge, and a jury of twelve of the vicinage, all of whom must agree on the verdict.Jackson v. Comm., 221 Ky.823, 299 S.W. 983 (1927).4 Tillery v. Commercial Nat.Bank, etc., 241 Ala.653, 4 So.2d 125 (1941); Stephens v. Kasten, 883 M11.127, 48 N.E.2d 508 (1943); Echlin v. Superior Court, etc., 13 Cal.2d 368, 90 P. 2d 63 (1939).Note: Kentucky holds the 9
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
2 Ky.Const.sec.242.3 Ky.Const.sec.7. The "ancient mode of trial by jury" means trial by jury according to the common law.Branham v. Comm., 209 Ky.734, 273 S.W. 489 (1925).The essentials of such mode are that one be tried in a court presided over by a judge, and a jury of twelve of the vicinage, all of whom must agree on the verdict.Jackson v. Comm., 221 Ky.823, 299 S.W. 983 (1927).4 Tillery v. Commercial Nat.Bank, etc., 241 Ala.653, 4 So.2d 125 (1941); Stephens v. Kasten, 883 M11.127, 48 N.E.2d 508 (1943); Echlin v. Superior Court, etc., 13 Cal.2d 368, 90 P. 2d 63 (1939).Note: Kentucky holds the 9
Key concepts: Jury, Jury trial, Law, Hung jury, Political science, Psychology