2013Politique africaineRequires access

Tensions and protests in a semi-authoritarian regime: Increasing popular uprisings and the endurance of the regime in Burkina Faso

Mathieu Hilgers, Augustin Loada

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In 2011, after the election of Compaore for the fourth time in a row, Burkina Faso was hit by an unprecedented wave of protests. How can one explain both the magnitude of these uprisings and how the regime has managed to stay in power? In order to address this apparently paradoxical growth of popular protests and the simultaneous weakness of the political opposition, this paper first explores some key elements and social divisions that structure the political and social space in the country. This exploration covers the role of the main actors of the crisis: the army, the ruling party, the chieftaincy, the political opposition, and the civil society associations. The second part of the article outlines a political sociology of Burkina Faso. To do so, it first draws attention to a set of tensions related to the semi-authoritarian nature of the regime. It then highlights the two main dividing lines that explain the mixed results of the protests.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In 2011, after the election of Compaore for the fourth time in a row, Burkina Faso was hit by an unprecedented wave of protests. How can one explain both the magnitude of these uprisings and how the regime has managed to stay in power? In order to address this apparently paradoxical growth of popular protests and the simultaneous weakness of the political opposition, this paper first explores some key elements and social divisions that structure the political and social space in the country. This exploration covers the role of the main actors of the crisis: the army, the ruling party, the chieftaincy, the political opposition, and the civil society associations. The second part of the article outlines a political sociology of Burkina Faso. To do so, it first draws attention to a set of tensions related to the semi-authoritarian nature of the regime. It then highlights the two main dividing lines that explain the mixed results of the protests.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In 2011, after the election of Compaore for the fourth time in a row, Burkina Faso was hit by an unprecedented wave of protests. How can one explain both the magnitude of these uprisings and how the regime has managed to stay in power? In order to address this apparently paradoxical growth of popular protests and the simultaneous weakness of the political opposition, this paper first explores some key elements and social divisions that structure the political and social space in the country. This exploration covers the role of the main actors of the crisis: the army, the ruling party, the chieftaincy, the political opposition, and the civil society associations. The second part of the article outlines a political sociology of Burkina Faso. To do so, it first draws attention to a set of tensions related to the semi-authoritarian nature of the regime. It then highlights the two main dividing lines that explain the mixed results of the protests.

Key concepts: Opposition (politics), Authoritarianism, Political economy, Politics, Political science, Civil society, Social movement, Power (physics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Tensions and protests in a semi-authoritarian regime: Increasing popular uprisings and the endurance of the regime in Burkina Faso — Research Paper | ScholarLens