2018Unpublished venueRequires access

Experimental Analysis of the Tournament Size on Genetic Algorithms

Yuri Lavinas, Claus Aranha, Tetsuya Sakurai, Marcelo Ladeira

Open publisher page 33 citations

Abstract

We perform an experimental study about the effect of the tournament size parameter from the Tournament Selection operator. Tournament Selection is a classic operator for Genetic Algorithms and Genetic Programming. It is simple to implement and has only one control parameter, the tournament size. Even though it is commonly used, most practitioners still rely on rules of thumb when choosing the tournament size. For example, almost all works in the past 15 years use a value of 2 for the tournament size, with little reasoning behind that choice. To understand the role of the tournament size, we run a real-valued GA on 24 BBOB problems with 10, 20 and 40 dimensions. We also vary the crossover operator and the generational policy of the GA. For each combination of the above factors we observe how the quality of the final solution changes with the tournament size. Our findings do not support the indiscriminate use of tournament size 2, and recommend a more careful set up of this parameter.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We perform an experimental study about the effect of the tournament size parameter from the Tournament Selection operator. Tournament Selection is a classic operator for Genetic Algorithms and Genetic Programming. It is simple to implement and has only one control parameter, the tournament size. Even though it is commonly used, most practitioners still rely on rules of thumb when choosing the tournament size. For example, almost all works in the past 15 years use a value of 2 for the tournament size, with little reasoning behind that choice. To understand the role of the tournament size, we run a real-valued GA on 24 BBOB problems with 10, 20 and 40 dimensions. We also vary the crossover operator and the generational policy of the GA. For each combination of the above factors we observe how the quality of the final solution changes with the tournament size. Our findings do not support the indiscriminate use of tournament size 2, and recommend a more careful set up of this parameter.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 33 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We perform an experimental study about the effect of the tournament size parameter from the Tournament Selection operator. Tournament Selection is a classic operator for Genetic Algorithms and Genetic Programming. It is simple to implement and has only one control parameter, the tournament size. Even though it is commonly used, most practitioners still rely on rules of thumb when choosing the tournament size. For example, almost all works in the past 15 years use a value of 2 for the tournament size, with little reasoning behind that choice. To understand the role of the tournament size, we run a real-valued GA on 24 BBOB problems with 10, 20 and 40 dimensions. We also vary the crossover operator and the generational policy of the GA. For each combination of the above factors we observe how the quality of the final solution changes with the tournament size. Our findings do not support the indiscriminate use of tournament size 2, and recommend a more careful set up of this parameter.

Key concepts: Tournament, Tournament selection, Crossover, Operator (biology), Genetic programming, Rule of thumb, Computer science, Genetic algorithm

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Experimental Analysis of the Tournament Size on Genetic Algorithms — Research Paper | ScholarLens