2018Unpublished venueRequires access

Quality Assurance System

Iwao Kobayashi

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The quality assurance (QA) system is often cited as a key ingredient for successful management in view of its direct relationship to many management objectives. Unfortunately, many companies depend on inspection as the cornerstone of QA. But even the best inspection won&s;t prevent the production of defective goods. The prevalent attitude among operators at such factories is that it&s;s their job to make things and the inspector&s;s job to catch mistakes. Consequently, operators are rarely held accountable for rejects produced at their stations. One problem with having inspections at the end of a production line is that the inspectors are often unable to tell which processes have caused the defects they find, which makes it difficult to devise countermeasures. The defect rate is usually calculated by dividing the total number of completed product units by the total number of manufactured units. This simple calculation method includes reworked units in the completed product total.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The quality assurance (QA) system is often cited as a key ingredient for successful management in view of its direct relationship to many management objectives. Unfortunately, many companies depend on inspection as the cornerstone of QA. But even the best inspection won&s;t prevent the production of defective goods. The prevalent attitude among operators at such factories is that it&s;s their job to make things and the inspector&s;s job to catch mistakes. Consequently, operators are rarely held accountable for rejects produced at their stations. One problem with having inspections at the end of a production line is that the inspectors are often unable to tell which processes have caused the defects they find, which makes it difficult to devise countermeasures. The defect rate is usually calculated by dividing the total number of completed product units by the total number of manufactured units. This simple calculation method includes reworked units in the completed product total.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The quality assurance (QA) system is often cited as a key ingredient for successful management in view of its direct relationship to many management objectives. Unfortunately, many companies depend on inspection as the cornerstone of QA. But even the best inspection won&s;t prevent the production of defective goods. The prevalent attitude among operators at such factories is that it&s;s their job to make things and the inspector&s;s job to catch mistakes. Consequently, operators are rarely held accountable for rejects produced at their stations. One problem with having inspections at the end of a production line is that the inspectors are often unable to tell which processes have caused the defects they find, which makes it difficult to devise countermeasures. The defect rate is usually calculated by dividing the total number of completed product units by the total number of manufactured units. This simple calculation method includes reworked units in the completed product total.

Key concepts: Quality assurance, Quality (philosophy), Business, Computer science, Philosophy, Marketing, Epistemology, Service (business)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Quality Assurance System — Research Paper | ScholarLens