2018Unpublished venueRequires access

Liberal welfare states

Hugh Bochel

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

This chapter explores the idea of liberal welfare states at a time when neoliberal ideas are seen to be a major influence on social policy. Some critiques of Esping-Andersen&s;s work have related to his methods, and in particular to the variables he selected and the construction of the decommodification indexes and regimes, and the impact these have on the identification of regimes. Other criticisms have been more directly specific to the concern with liberal welfare regimes, and these have been both empirical and theoretical. One further potential criticism is the very use of the term &s;liberal&s; by Esping-Andersen. As an ideology, liberalism may arguably best be understood as reflecting a broad tradition of thought, rather than as a fixed set of beliefs. Despite some of the criticisms of the narrow range of policy areas in Esping-Andersen&s;s original work, others have argued that broadening the scope of analysis beyond income support can still produce broadly similar findings.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter explores the idea of liberal welfare states at a time when neoliberal ideas are seen to be a major influence on social policy. Some critiques of Esping-Andersen&s;s work have related to his methods, and in particular to the variables he selected and the construction of the decommodification indexes and regimes, and the impact these have on the identification of regimes. Other criticisms have been more directly specific to the concern with liberal welfare regimes, and these have been both empirical and theoretical. One further potential criticism is the very use of the term &s;liberal&s; by Esping-Andersen. As an ideology, liberalism may arguably best be understood as reflecting a broad tradition of thought, rather than as a fixed set of beliefs. Despite some of the criticisms of the narrow range of policy areas in Esping-Andersen&s;s original work, others have argued that broadening the scope of analysis beyond income support can still produce broadly similar findings.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter explores the idea of liberal welfare states at a time when neoliberal ideas are seen to be a major influence on social policy. Some critiques of Esping-Andersen&s;s work have related to his methods, and in particular to the variables he selected and the construction of the decommodification indexes and regimes, and the impact these have on the identification of regimes. Other criticisms have been more directly specific to the concern with liberal welfare regimes, and these have been both empirical and theoretical. One further potential criticism is the very use of the term &s;liberal&s; by Esping-Andersen. As an ideology, liberalism may arguably best be understood as reflecting a broad tradition of thought, rather than as a fixed set of beliefs. Despite some of the criticisms of the narrow range of policy areas in Esping-Andersen&s;s original work, others have argued that broadening the scope of analysis beyond income support can still produce broadly similar findings.

Key concepts: Welfare state, Welfare, Political science, Law, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Liberal welfare states — Research Paper | ScholarLens