Private Sexuality, Public Morality and Modern Sexology: What Prospects of Sexuality in Times of Uncertainty?
Michael Hviid Jacobsen
Abstract
Michael Hviid Jacobsen
Abstract
This chapter investigates the heteronormativity and dominance of the conformist heterosexual ideal in Western society. It examines the heteronormative foundation of the social scientific interest in human sexuality, how this biased perspective evolved particularly during the modern epoch and how it has been transformed. The chapter provides a picture of contemporary politics of sexuality as moulded by the sexual prescriptions of more than 100 years of heteronormative social science. It proposes a tentative alternative to this heteronormative bias in science as well as in society, in which individual freedom of choice is coupled with obligations and responsibilities, not to morality or social convention, but toward other individuals. Where the morality of conformity promises certainty mixed with fear, the morality of choice, on the other hand, promises uncertainty and anxiety mixed with freedom. The chapter seeks to illustrate the historical backdrop for the social and scientific bias and aspires to point to new horizons in the understanding of sexuality.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This chapter investigates the heteronormativity and dominance of the conformist heterosexual ideal in Western society. It examines the heteronormative foundation of the social scientific interest in human sexuality, how this biased perspective evolved particularly during the modern epoch and how it has been transformed. The chapter provides a picture of contemporary politics of sexuality as moulded by the sexual prescriptions of more than 100 years of heteronormative social science. It proposes a tentative alternative to this heteronormative bias in science as well as in society, in which individual freedom of choice is coupled with obligations and responsibilities, not to morality or social convention, but toward other individuals. Where the morality of conformity promises certainty mixed with fear, the morality of choice, on the other hand, promises uncertainty and anxiety mixed with freedom. The chapter seeks to illustrate the historical backdrop for the social and scientific bias and aspires to point to new horizons in the understanding of sexuality.
Key concepts: Sexology, Human sexuality, Morality, Political science, Gender studies, Sociology, Law