2018Personality and Mental HealthOpen access

The concurrent validity of a Web‐based self‐report assessment for personality disorders

Farid Chakhssi, Ies Dijksman, Mara L. Velmans, J. Monique Zoet, Jeanine M. Oostendorp, Geert‐Jan Dinant, Mark Spigt

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

Incorporating online tools in clinical practice could help improve routine assessments of personality disorders and their co-occurring clinical disorders. TeleScreen, a Web-based self-report questionnaire for DSM-IV disorders, has not yet been compared with well-validated structured interviews for clinical and personality disorders. Patients with personality disorders (n = 89) were assessed with TeleScreen and independently interviewed with Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis-I disorders (SCID-I) and personality disorders (SCID-II). The concurrent validity was examined using sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Five personality disorders had a prevalence rate higher than 4% and could be examined in the analyses: borderline, obsessive-compulsive, dependent, avoidant and paranoid personality disorders. TeleScreen showed moderate to good validity for borderline personality disorder and obsessive-compulsive personality disorder but suboptimal validity for the dependent, avoidant and paranoid personality disorders. Clinical disorders showed moderate to good values, except for social phobia, dysthymia and eating disorders. These findings provide preliminary evidence for the concurrent validity of TeleScreen for some personality disorders, such as the borderline personality disorder, and pave the way for larger studies to confirm these results. © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Incorporating online tools in clinical practice could help improve routine assessments of personality disorders and their co-occurring clinical disorders. TeleScreen, a Web-based self-report questionnaire for DSM-IV disorders, has not yet been compared with well-validated structured interviews for clinical and personality disorders. Patients with personality disorders (n = 89) were assessed with TeleScreen and independently interviewed with Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis-I disorders (SCID-I) and personality disorders (SCID-II). The concurrent validity was examined using sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Five personality disorders had a prevalence rate higher than 4% and could be examined in the analyses: borderline, obsessive-compulsive, dependent, avoidant and paranoid personality disorders. TeleScreen showed moderate to good validity for borderline personality disorder and obsessive-compulsive personality disorder but suboptimal validity for the dependent, avoidant and paranoid personality disorders. Clinical disorders showed moderate to good values, except for social phobia, dysthymia and eating disorders. These findings provide preliminary evidence for the concurrent validity of TeleScreen for some personality disorders, such as the borderline personality disorder, and pave the way for larger studies to confirm these results. © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Incorporating online tools in clinical practice could help improve routine assessments of personality disorders and their co-occurring clinical disorders. TeleScreen, a Web-based self-report questionnaire for DSM-IV disorders, has not yet been compared with well-validated structured interviews for clinical and personality disorders. Patients with personality disorders (n = 89) were assessed with TeleScreen and independently interviewed with Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis-I disorders (SCID-I) and personality disorders (SCID-II). The concurrent validity was examined using sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Five personality disorders had a prevalence rate higher than 4% and could be examined in the analyses: borderline, obsessive-compulsive, dependent, avoidant and paranoid personality disorders. TeleScreen showed moderate to good validity for borderline personality disorder and obsessive-compulsive personality disorder but suboptimal validity for the dependent, avoidant and paranoid personality disorders. Clinical disorders showed moderate to good values, except for social phobia, dysthymia and eating disorders. These findings provide preliminary evidence for the concurrent validity of TeleScreen for some personality disorders, such as the borderline personality disorder, and pave the way for larger studies to confirm these results. © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Key concepts: Personality disorders, Psychology, Sadistic personality disorder, Avoidant personality disorder, Personality, Clinical psychology, Personality Assessment Inventory, Borderline personality disorder

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The concurrent validity of a Web‐based self‐report assessment for personality disorders — Research Paper | ScholarLens