2017•Unpublished venueRequires access

The Courts and the Congress

Robert Stevens, Rosemary Stevens, Rosemary Stevens

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The initial vagueness in the Medicaid legislation compelled the courts to play a significant role in the various battles surrounding Medicaid. The Court was available to develop the policies which Congress was reluctant to clarify and to implement effectively those policies which state welfare departments implemented with conventional caution. The idea that the different Medicaid categories were so irrational as to amount to a denial of equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution was first floated before Judge Motley in O&s;Reilly v. Wyman . The Congressional tax committees, meanwhile, were continuing efforts to make Medicare and Medicaid more productive and effective, and numerous proponents of national health insurance were suggesting schemes which differed radically among themselves, would add to health care expenditures. Welfare activists may be able to win court battles, but the wars have to be fought in the legislature.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The initial vagueness in the Medicaid legislation compelled the courts to play a significant role in the various battles surrounding Medicaid. The Court was available to develop the policies which Congress was reluctant to clarify and to implement effectively those policies which state welfare departments implemented with conventional caution. The idea that the different Medicaid categories were so irrational as to amount to a denial of equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution was first floated before Judge Motley in O&s;Reilly v. Wyman . The Congressional tax committees, meanwhile, were continuing efforts to make Medicare and Medicaid more productive and effective, and numerous proponents of national health insurance were suggesting schemes which differed radically among themselves, would add to health care expenditures. Welfare activists may be able to win court battles, but the wars have to be fought in the legislature.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The initial vagueness in the Medicaid legislation compelled the courts to play a significant role in the various battles surrounding Medicaid. The Court was available to develop the policies which Congress was reluctant to clarify and to implement effectively those policies which state welfare departments implemented with conventional caution. The idea that the different Medicaid categories were so irrational as to amount to a denial of equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution was first floated before Judge Motley in O&s;Reilly v. Wyman . The Congressional tax committees, meanwhile, were continuing efforts to make Medicare and Medicaid more productive and effective, and numerous proponents of national health insurance were suggesting schemes which differed radically among themselves, would add to health care expenditures. Welfare activists may be able to win court battles, but the wars have to be fought in the legislature.

Key concepts: Political science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Courts and the Congress — Research Paper | ScholarLens