2018RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsOpen access

Do Bonus Payments Enhance Agri-environmental Payments? Empirical Findings from Rice Farming in Japan

Keiko Tanaka, Tanaka, K.

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Agri-environmental payments (AEP) have been implemented for more than ten years and considered as a primary agri-enviromental policy in Japan. However, program enrollment is close to its peak due partly to budget limitation and rigid payment scheme. It might be possible to increase program participation by introducing some flexible payment schemes. This study investigates the effects of different bonus (extra payment) payments on farmers acceptance decisions of the AEP in Japan. To achieve this objective, we conducted a survey for 576 rice farmers in four prefectures (Akita, Fukui, Shiga, and Shimane). We introduced three hypothetical bonus payments (scale, acquisition, and adjacency) and asked farmers about their possible acceptance. Farmers responses were then used to derive their minimum acceptable bonus levels. Our results show that farmers are quite responsive to scale and adjacency bonus payments, but not to acquisition bonus. Our results also show that there is significant variation in minimum acceptable bonus, reflecting considerable heterogeneity among farmers in the study region. Using these estimated results, Japan s AEP would attract more farmers and achieve significant efficiency gain without substantial budget increase. Acknowledgement :

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Agri-environmental payments (AEP) have been implemented for more than ten years and considered as a primary agri-enviromental policy in Japan. However, program enrollment is close to its peak due partly to budget limitation and rigid payment scheme. It might be possible to increase program participation by introducing some flexible payment schemes. This study investigates the effects of different bonus (extra payment) payments on farmers acceptance decisions of the AEP in Japan. To achieve this objective, we conducted a survey for 576 rice farmers in four prefectures (Akita, Fukui, Shiga, and Shimane). We introduced three hypothetical bonus payments (scale, acquisition, and adjacency) and asked farmers about their possible acceptance. Farmers responses were then used to derive their minimum acceptable bonus levels. Our results show that farmers are quite responsive to scale and adjacency bonus payments, but not to acquisition bonus. Our results also show that there is significant variation in minimum acceptable bonus, reflecting considerable heterogeneity among farmers in the study region. Using these estimated results, Japan s AEP would attract more farmers and achieve significant efficiency gain without substantial budget increase. Acknowledgement :

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Agri-environmental payments (AEP) have been implemented for more than ten years and considered as a primary agri-enviromental policy in Japan. However, program enrollment is close to its peak due partly to budget limitation and rigid payment scheme. It might be possible to increase program participation by introducing some flexible payment schemes. This study investigates the effects of different bonus (extra payment) payments on farmers acceptance decisions of the AEP in Japan. To achieve this objective, we conducted a survey for 576 rice farmers in four prefectures (Akita, Fukui, Shiga, and Shimane). We introduced three hypothetical bonus payments (scale, acquisition, and adjacency) and asked farmers about their possible acceptance. Farmers responses were then used to derive their minimum acceptable bonus levels. Our results show that farmers are quite responsive to scale and adjacency bonus payments, but not to acquisition bonus. Our results also show that there is significant variation in minimum acceptable bonus, reflecting considerable heterogeneity among farmers in the study region. Using these estimated results, Japan s AEP would attract more farmers and achieve significant efficiency gain without substantial budget increase. Acknowledgement :

Key concepts: Payment, Acknowledgement, Agriculture, Business, Scale (ratio), Direct Payments, Agricultural economics, Survey data collection

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Do Bonus Payments Enhance Agri-environmental Payments? Empirical Findings from Rice Farming in Japan — Research Paper | ScholarLens