2018UrologiyaOpen access

Assessment of the role of ultrasound diagnostic methods in identifying PIN

M. P. Мelnychuk, O.O. Lulko, A.Z. Zhuravchak

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the problem of prostate intraepithelial neoplasia ultrasound diagnostics. The objective was to determine specific ultrasound features of PIN. Transrectal ultrasound and Doppler data of 166 patients with high grade and low grade PIN were analysed. Such ultrasound features as echogenicity (hypo-, iso- and hyperechogenic) and vascularisation grade (hypo-, iso- and hypervascularisation) of prostate samples with PIN were compared. There was no any statistically confirmed difference in echogenicity and vascularisation determined between high and low grade PIN and normal prostate tissue. Investigation data indicate low significance of transrectal ultrasound and dopplerography in diagnostics of prostate intraepithelial neoplasia.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The article is dedicated to the problem of prostate intraepithelial neoplasia ultrasound diagnostics. The objective was to determine specific ultrasound features of PIN. Transrectal ultrasound and Doppler data of 166 patients with high grade and low grade PIN were analysed. Such ultrasound features as echogenicity (hypo-, iso- and hyperechogenic) and vascularisation grade (hypo-, iso- and hypervascularisation) of prostate samples with PIN were compared. There was no any statistically confirmed difference in echogenicity and vascularisation determined between high and low grade PIN and normal prostate tissue. Investigation data indicate low significance of transrectal ultrasound and dopplerography in diagnostics of prostate intraepithelial neoplasia.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The article is dedicated to the problem of prostate intraepithelial neoplasia ultrasound diagnostics. The objective was to determine specific ultrasound features of PIN. Transrectal ultrasound and Doppler data of 166 patients with high grade and low grade PIN were analysed. Such ultrasound features as echogenicity (hypo-, iso- and hyperechogenic) and vascularisation grade (hypo-, iso- and hypervascularisation) of prostate samples with PIN were compared. There was no any statistically confirmed difference in echogenicity and vascularisation determined between high and low grade PIN and normal prostate tissue. Investigation data indicate low significance of transrectal ultrasound and dopplerography in diagnostics of prostate intraepithelial neoplasia.

Key concepts: Echogenicity, Ultrasound, Prostate, Medicine, Radiology, Intraepithelial neoplasia, Prostate gland, Nuclear medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Assessment of the role of ultrasound diagnostic methods in identifying PIN — Research Paper | ScholarLens