2014Journal of Clinical OncologyRequires access

Loss of BAP1 and PBRM1 expression in non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas compared to clear cell renal cell carcinomas.

Thai H. Ho, Payal Kapur, Richard W. Joseph, Daniel Serie, Jeanette E. Eckel‐Passow, Mansi Parasramka, John C. Cheville, James Brugarolas, Alexander S. Parker

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

4529 Background: Loss of function mutations in PBRM1 (41-50%) and BAP1(5-15%) are associated with poor outcomes for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) tumors. However, there are no data regarding the prevalence of these mutations in other RCC subtypes (non-ccRCC). We evaluated loss of PBRM1 and BAP1 expression in ccRCC and non-ccRCC tumors using an IHC assay for which negative staining correlates with loss of function mutations. Methods: From our Registry database, we identified 311 and 105 patients treated surgically for ccRCC and non-ccRCC. We performed IHC assays to evaluate PBRM1 and BAP1 protein expression. We classified tumors as BAP1 or PBRM1 negative when tumor cells showed diffuse absence of nuclear staining. We compared loss of expression of these two proteins between ccRCC and non-ccRCC using Fisher’s exact tests. Results: Of the total cohort of 416 patients, we successfully stained BAP1 in 406 (97.5%) and PBRM1 in 372 (89.4%). Of those with successful staining, we further excluded samples with focal negative or weak positive expression of BAP1 (n=59) or PBRM1 (n=55). Thus, we were left with 186 ccRCC and 79 non-ccRCC patient samples that had both BAP1 and PBRM1 available for analysis. We observed BAP1 loss of expression in 9% (17/186) of the ccRCC tumors but only 1% (1/79) of the non-ccRCC tumors (p=0.016). Similarly, we noted loss of expression of PBRM1 in 43% (80/186) of the ccRCC tumors but only 4% (3/79) of the non-ccRCC tumors (p=0.0001). Of note, within the non-ccRCC group, we observed 0% (0/61) papillary tumors and 5% (1/18) chromophobe tumors with loss of BAP1. By comparison, 3% (2/61) of papillary tumors and 1/18 (5%) of chromophobe tumors showed loss of PBRM1 expression. Conclusions: Our data are the first to suggest that loss of function mutations in PBRM1 and BAP1 are less common in non-ccRCC tumors compared to ccRCC. If these findings are independently confirmed, they suggest that while loss of PBRM1 and BAP1 are key events in ccRCC, disruption of other pathways may support tumorigenesis in non-ccRCC subtypes. BAP1/PBRM1 Papillary Chromophobe ccRCC -/- 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (2%) -/+ 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 14 (8%) +/- 2 (3%) 1 (5%) 77 (41%) +/+ 59 (97%) 16 (90%) 92 (49%) 61 18 186

About this research paper

What this paper is about

4529 Background: Loss of function mutations in PBRM1 (41-50%) and BAP1(5-15%) are associated with poor outcomes for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) tumors. However, there are no data regarding the prevalence of these mutations in other RCC subtypes (non-ccRCC). We evaluated loss of PBRM1 and BAP1 expression in ccRCC and non-ccRCC tumors using an IHC assay for which negative staining correlates with loss of function mutations. Methods: From our Registry database, we identified 311 and 105 patients treated surgically for ccRCC and non-ccRCC. We performed IHC assays to evaluate PBRM1 and BAP1 protein expression. We classified tumors as BAP1 or PBRM1 negative when tumor cells showed diffuse absence of nuclear staining. We compared loss of expression of these two proteins between ccRCC and non-ccRCC using Fisher’s exact tests. Results: Of the total cohort of 416 patients, we successfully stained BAP1 in 406 (97.5%) and PBRM1 in 372 (89.4%). Of those with successful staining, we further excluded samples with focal negative or weak positive expression of BAP1 (n=59) or PBRM1 (n=55). Thus, we were left with 186 ccRCC and 79 non-ccRCC patient samples that had both BAP1 and PBRM1 available for analysis. We observed BAP1 loss of expression in 9% (17/186) of the ccRCC tumors but only 1% (1/79) of the non-ccRCC tumors (p=0.016). Similarly, we noted loss of expression of PBRM1 in 43% (80/186) of the ccRCC tumors but only 4% (3/79) of the non-ccRCC tumors (p=0.0001). Of note, within the non-ccRCC group, we observed 0% (0/61) papillary tumors and 5% (1/18) chromophobe tumors with loss of BAP1. By comparison, 3% (2/61) of papillary tumors and 1/18 (5%) of chromophobe tumors showed loss of PBRM1 expression. Conclusions: Our data are the first to suggest that loss of function mutations in PBRM1 and BAP1 are less common in non-ccRCC tumors compared to ccRCC. If these findings are independently confirmed, they suggest that while loss of PBRM1 and BAP1 are key events in ccRCC, disruption of other pathways may support tumorigenesis in non-ccRCC subtypes. BAP1/PBRM1 Papillary Chromophobe ccRCC -/- 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (2%) -/+ 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 14 (8%) +/- 2 (3%) 1 (5%) 77 (41%) +/+ 59 (97%) 16 (90%) 92 (49%) 61 18 186

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

4529 Background: Loss of function mutations in PBRM1 (41-50%) and BAP1(5-15%) are associated with poor outcomes for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) tumors. However, there are no data regarding the prevalence of these mutations in other RCC subtypes (non-ccRCC). We evaluated loss of PBRM1 and BAP1 expression in ccRCC and non-ccRCC tumors using an IHC assay for which negative staining correlates with loss of function mutations. Methods: From our Registry database, we identified 311 and 105 patients treated surgically for ccRCC and non-ccRCC. We performed IHC assays to evaluate PBRM1 and BAP1 protein expression. We classified tumors as BAP1 or PBRM1 negative when tumor cells showed diffuse absence of nuclear staining. We compared loss of expression of these two proteins between ccRCC and non-ccRCC using Fisher’s exact tests. Results: Of the total cohort of 416 patients, we successfully stained BAP1 in 406 (97.5%) and PBRM1 in 372 (89.4%). Of those with successful staining, we further excluded samples with focal negative or weak positive expression of BAP1 (n=59) or PBRM1 (n=55). Thus, we were left with 186 ccRCC and 79 non-ccRCC patient samples that had both BAP1 and PBRM1 available for analysis. We observed BAP1 loss of expression in 9% (17/186) of the ccRCC tumors but only 1% (1/79) of the non-ccRCC tumors (p=0.016). Similarly, we noted loss of expression of PBRM1 in 43% (80/186) of the ccRCC tumors but only 4% (3/79) of the non-ccRCC tumors (p=0.0001). Of note, within the non-ccRCC group, we observed 0% (0/61) papillary tumors and 5% (1/18) chromophobe tumors with loss of BAP1. By comparison, 3% (2/61) of papillary tumors and 1/18 (5%) of chromophobe tumors showed loss of PBRM1 expression. Conclusions: Our data are the first to suggest that loss of function mutations in PBRM1 and BAP1 are less common in non-ccRCC tumors compared to ccRCC. If these findings are independently confirmed, they suggest that while loss of PBRM1 and BAP1 are key events in ccRCC, disruption of other pathways may support tumorigenesis in non-ccRCC subtypes. BAP1/PBRM1 Papillary Chromophobe ccRCC -/- 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (2%) -/+ 0 (0%) 1 (5%) 14 (8%) +/- 2 (3%) 1 (5%) 77 (41%) +/+ 59 (97%) 16 (90%) 92 (49%) 61 18 186

Key concepts: BAP1, Clear cell renal cell carcinoma, Medicine, Immunohistochemistry, Renal cell carcinoma, Pathology, Cancer research, Staining

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Loss of BAP1 and PBRM1 expression in non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas compared to clear cell renal cell carcinomas. — Research Paper | ScholarLens