Exploring the Landscape of Research-based theatre: Playwright, Researcher, Educator
Richard Sallis
Abstract
Richard Sallis
Abstract
Like some other contemporary proponents in the field of research-based theatre (Belliveau and Lea, 2016) I tend to use the following terms interchangeably whilst acknowledging that they have their own particular meanings and nuances: performed research (Sajnani, Sallis and Salvatore, 2018, in- press), ethnodrama (Saldana, 2005) and ethnographic performance (Wellin, 1996). A common thread which links all of these terms is that they refer to a process whereby research data and research report findings are transformed into a dramatic text and presented as performance. With its postmodern performance aesthetic research-based theatre can require audiences to both interpret and interact with the work; the performance is a dialogic event, that is the audience becomes a part of the performance, in one way or another. In a Boalian (1979) sense, audience members can be invited to not merely observe a performance but critique it as well and may even be drawn into the action of stage. With experience as a drama educator, ethnographer and as a theatre industry creative, I am keen to explore the potential of performed research as a form with which to share my qualitative/ethnographic research findings. To date most of my research-based performance pieces have featured teachers (pre-service and in-service) and students as research participants and subsequently they have become the characters in my plays and the primary or initial audience for the subsequent performance.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Like some other contemporary proponents in the field of research-based theatre (Belliveau and Lea, 2016) I tend to use the following terms interchangeably whilst acknowledging that they have their own particular meanings and nuances: performed research (Sajnani, Sallis and Salvatore, 2018, in- press), ethnodrama (Saldana, 2005) and ethnographic performance (Wellin, 1996). A common thread which links all of these terms is that they refer to a process whereby research data and research report findings are transformed into a dramatic text and presented as performance. With its postmodern performance aesthetic research-based theatre can require audiences to both interpret and interact with the work; the performance is a dialogic event, that is the audience becomes a part of the performance, in one way or another. In a Boalian (1979) sense, audience members can be invited to not merely observe a performance but critique it as well and may even be drawn into the action of stage. With experience as a drama educator, ethnographer and as a theatre industry creative, I am keen to explore the potential of performed research as a form with which to share my qualitative/ethnographic research findings. To date most of my research-based performance pieces have featured teachers (pre-service and in-service) and students as research participants and subsequently they have become the characters in my plays and the primary or initial audience for the subsequent performance.
Key concepts: Dialogic, Drama, Ethnography, Postmodernism, Sociology, Performance studies, Aesthetics, Action research