2016Unpublished venueRequires access

Zero goodwill impairment: market indicationswithout measurement

Jamaliah Abdul Majid

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This study examines the determinants of the recognition choice related to reporting zero goodwill impairment after an implementation of an impairment-only approach to accounting for acquired goodwill. The analysis is carried out by focusing on listed companies in an emerging economy of Malaysia from 2006-2012 that experienced declines in the market values below the book values of the net assets for three consecutive years. Regression results show that the recognition choice can be explained partly by the high book-to-market ratio, and the types of industry the firms operated. The results also show that firms that have an improvement in the operating cash flows and acquired goodwill during the year are less likely to exercise the recognition choice in reporting zero goodwill impairment. The study contributes modestly to the accounting choice literature by providing new empirical evidence on the determinants of the recognition choice related to reporting zero goodwill impairment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study examines the determinants of the recognition choice related to reporting zero goodwill impairment after an implementation of an impairment-only approach to accounting for acquired goodwill. The analysis is carried out by focusing on listed companies in an emerging economy of Malaysia from 2006-2012 that experienced declines in the market values below the book values of the net assets for three consecutive years. Regression results show that the recognition choice can be explained partly by the high book-to-market ratio, and the types of industry the firms operated. The results also show that firms that have an improvement in the operating cash flows and acquired goodwill during the year are less likely to exercise the recognition choice in reporting zero goodwill impairment. The study contributes modestly to the accounting choice literature by providing new empirical evidence on the determinants of the recognition choice related to reporting zero goodwill impairment.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study examines the determinants of the recognition choice related to reporting zero goodwill impairment after an implementation of an impairment-only approach to accounting for acquired goodwill. The analysis is carried out by focusing on listed companies in an emerging economy of Malaysia from 2006-2012 that experienced declines in the market values below the book values of the net assets for three consecutive years. Regression results show that the recognition choice can be explained partly by the high book-to-market ratio, and the types of industry the firms operated. The results also show that firms that have an improvement in the operating cash flows and acquired goodwill during the year are less likely to exercise the recognition choice in reporting zero goodwill impairment. The study contributes modestly to the accounting choice literature by providing new empirical evidence on the determinants of the recognition choice related to reporting zero goodwill impairment.

Key concepts: Goodwill, Business, Accounting, Zero (linguistics), Cash, Actuarial science, Economics, Finance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Zero goodwill impairment: market indicationswithout measurement — Research Paper | ScholarLens