2018International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research (IJETR)Open access

Design of Low Power Half Adder using Static 125nm CMOS Technology

G. Hemanth Kumar, N. Harish, G. Barath, D. Ajay, R. Jagadheeswaran, G. Naveen Balaji

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The key components in digital design are Half adders.They perform not only addition operations, but also many other functions such as subtraction, multiplication and division.Very Large-Scale Integrated circuits (VLSI) frequently requires adders of various bit widths from processors to Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs).Recently reported logic style comparisons based on full-adder circuits claims that the Complementary Pass transistor Logic (CPL) is much more power-efficient than complementarymetal oxide semiconductor(CMOS).However, new comparisons are performed on more efficient (CMOS) circuit realizations and a wider range of different logic cells as well as the use of realistic circuit arrangements demonstrates that the (CMOS) is superior to (CPL) in most cases with respect to speed, area, power dissipation, and power-delay products.Even Adder designed using (CMOS) complementary metal oxide semiconductor technology can have more power as well as speed than that using (CMOS) technology.The most important and widely accepted matrices for measuring the quality of adder designs power dissipation,propagation delay, and area.The overall performance can be significantly improved by using arithmetic circuits.This paper describes the comparative performance of half adder designed using TANNER (EDA) Electronic Design Automation, using different (CMOS) logic design styles.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The key components in digital design are Half adders.They perform not only addition operations, but also many other functions such as subtraction, multiplication and division.Very Large-Scale Integrated circuits (VLSI) frequently requires adders of various bit widths from processors to Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs).Recently reported logic style comparisons based on full-adder circuits claims that the Complementary Pass transistor Logic (CPL) is much more power-efficient than complementarymetal oxide semiconductor(CMOS).However, new comparisons are performed on more efficient (CMOS) circuit realizations and a wider range of different logic cells as well as the use of realistic circuit arrangements demonstrates that the (CMOS) is superior to (CPL) in most cases with respect to speed, area, power dissipation, and power-delay products.Even Adder designed using (CMOS) complementary metal oxide semiconductor technology can have more power as well as speed than that using (CMOS) technology.The most important and widely accepted matrices for measuring the quality of adder designs power dissipation,propagation delay, and area.The overall performance can be significantly improved by using arithmetic circuits.This paper describes the comparative performance of half adder designed using TANNER (EDA) Electronic Design Automation, using different (CMOS) logic design styles.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The key components in digital design are Half adders.They perform not only addition operations, but also many other functions such as subtraction, multiplication and division.Very Large-Scale Integrated circuits (VLSI) frequently requires adders of various bit widths from processors to Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs).Recently reported logic style comparisons based on full-adder circuits claims that the Complementary Pass transistor Logic (CPL) is much more power-efficient than complementarymetal oxide semiconductor(CMOS).However, new comparisons are performed on more efficient (CMOS) circuit realizations and a wider range of different logic cells as well as the use of realistic circuit arrangements demonstrates that the (CMOS) is superior to (CPL) in most cases with respect to speed, area, power dissipation, and power-delay products.Even Adder designed using (CMOS) complementary metal oxide semiconductor technology can have more power as well as speed than that using (CMOS) technology.The most important and widely accepted matrices for measuring the quality of adder designs power dissipation,propagation delay, and area.The overall performance can be significantly improved by using arithmetic circuits.This paper describes the comparative performance of half adder designed using TANNER (EDA) Electronic Design Automation, using different (CMOS) logic design styles.

Key concepts: Adder, CMOS, Power (physics), Electronic engineering, Computer science, Electrical engineering, Engineering, Physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Design of Low Power Half Adder using Static 125nm CMOS Technology — Research Paper | ScholarLens