2019•Cold Spring Harbor ProtocolsOpen access

Protein A and Protein G Purification of Antibodies

Jordan B. Fishman, Eric A. Berg

Open full text 68 citations

Abstract

sp., respectively, that have been adapted for use in purifying large amounts of IgG. They are available covalently attached to affinity resins such as 4% cross-linked agarose, making them suitable for low-pressure antibody isolation. Protein A is not recommended for the isolation of mouse mAbs because it lacks affinity for mouse IgG1, or for the isolation of antibodies from sheep, goat, chicken, hamster, or rat. IgGs from most species bind to Protein G at near physiological pH and ionic strength with a higher affinity than IgG binding to Protein A. Therefore, the pH required to dissociate bound IgG is lower, resulting in the loss of activity for some antibodies. If this is observed, Protein A may be an alternative if the IgG from the species being isolated can be purified using Protein A. Neither Protein A nor Protein G can be used for the isolation of chicken antibodies.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

sp., respectively, that have been adapted for use in purifying large amounts of IgG. They are available covalently attached to affinity resins such as 4% cross-linked agarose, making them suitable for low-pressure antibody isolation. Protein A is not recommended for the isolation of mouse mAbs because it lacks affinity for mouse IgG1, or for the isolation of antibodies from sheep, goat, chicken, hamster, or rat. IgGs from most species bind to Protein G at near physiological pH and ionic strength with a higher affinity than IgG binding to Protein A. Therefore, the pH required to dissociate bound IgG is lower, resulting in the loss of activity for some antibodies. If this is observed, Protein A may be an alternative if the IgG from the species being isolated can be purified using Protein A. Neither Protein A nor Protein G can be used for the isolation of chicken antibodies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 68 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

sp., respectively, that have been adapted for use in purifying large amounts of IgG. They are available covalently attached to affinity resins such as 4% cross-linked agarose, making them suitable for low-pressure antibody isolation. Protein A is not recommended for the isolation of mouse mAbs because it lacks affinity for mouse IgG1, or for the isolation of antibodies from sheep, goat, chicken, hamster, or rat. IgGs from most species bind to Protein G at near physiological pH and ionic strength with a higher affinity than IgG binding to Protein A. Therefore, the pH required to dissociate bound IgG is lower, resulting in the loss of activity for some antibodies. If this is observed, Protein A may be an alternative if the IgG from the species being isolated can be purified using Protein A. Neither Protein A nor Protein G can be used for the isolation of chicken antibodies.

Key concepts: Antibody, Protein A/G, Protein G, Chemistry, Protein A, Agarose, Biochemistry, Immunoglobulin G

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Protein A and Protein G Purification of Antibodies — Research Paper | ScholarLens