2018The Journal of Law Economics and OrganizationRequires access

Communication and the Optimality of Hierarchy in Organizations

Huanxing Yang, Lan Zhang

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

This paper studies optimal organization structures in multidivisional organizations with more than two divisions. The decisions of individual divisions need to be adapted to local conditions but also be coordinated. Information about local conditions is held by division managers who communicate strategically. In this setting, in addition to centralized and decentralized organizations, a hierarchical organization may arise in which divisions are organized into groups, and decisions are made by group managers. Our central result is that when the needs for coordination are intermediate, such a hierarchical organization performs better than centralization or decentralization. We then compare Ms-form hierarchy (in which mutually more dependent divisions are grouped together) and Mw-form hierarchy (in which mutually less dependent divisions are grouped together). Somewhat surprisingly, an Mw-form is sometimes preferred over an Ms-form hierarchy. (JEL D23, D83, L23)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper studies optimal organization structures in multidivisional organizations with more than two divisions. The decisions of individual divisions need to be adapted to local conditions but also be coordinated. Information about local conditions is held by division managers who communicate strategically. In this setting, in addition to centralized and decentralized organizations, a hierarchical organization may arise in which divisions are organized into groups, and decisions are made by group managers. Our central result is that when the needs for coordination are intermediate, such a hierarchical organization performs better than centralization or decentralization. We then compare Ms-form hierarchy (in which mutually more dependent divisions are grouped together) and Mw-form hierarchy (in which mutually less dependent divisions are grouped together). Somewhat surprisingly, an Mw-form is sometimes preferred over an Ms-form hierarchy. (JEL D23, D83, L23)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper studies optimal organization structures in multidivisional organizations with more than two divisions. The decisions of individual divisions need to be adapted to local conditions but also be coordinated. Information about local conditions is held by division managers who communicate strategically. In this setting, in addition to centralized and decentralized organizations, a hierarchical organization may arise in which divisions are organized into groups, and decisions are made by group managers. Our central result is that when the needs for coordination are intermediate, such a hierarchical organization performs better than centralization or decentralization. We then compare Ms-form hierarchy (in which mutually more dependent divisions are grouped together) and Mw-form hierarchy (in which mutually less dependent divisions are grouped together). Somewhat surprisingly, an Mw-form is sometimes preferred over an Ms-form hierarchy. (JEL D23, D83, L23)

Key concepts: Hierarchy, Hierarchical organization, Decentralization, Division (mathematics), Business, Group (periodic table), Control (management), Organizational structure

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Communication and the Optimality of Hierarchy in Organizations — Research Paper | ScholarLens