2010Unpublished venueRequires access

Impact of Road Markings and Intersection Layout on the Behavior of Turning Vehicles at Signalized Intersections

Moritz von Mörner

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to research driver behavior at pavement markings at signalized intersections – in a comparison of Japan and Germany – to give a recommendation on future applications of pavement markings. Both industrialized countries have a comparably well-developed traffic infrastructure. As similar markings suggest similar driver behaviors, differences lead to pavement markings that might influence driver behavior differently. Focus is set on pavement markings at left turns in Japan, which is equivalent to right turns in Germany. Here, especially in Nagoya city, curb markings and channelization markings are extensively used at large, high demand intersections. Driver behavior was observed from video data at five sites, stating if vehicles were moving according to pavement markings or ignoring markings. Furthermore, video data from one turn was used to plot drivers trajectories and get differences in vehicle types and speed profiles. Speed profiles show that hardly any free flow vehicles ignore pavement markings. Vehicles start cutting markings when leading vehicles slow down e.g. to let pedestrians pass. Here following vehicles try to pass. At both observed turns featured with curb markings, vehicles ignored this type of marking. Leading to the impression that drivers rather focus on something solid – e.g. the curb – than markings. A high percentage of drivers ignored the channelization markings at large, high demand turns. One observed turn was feature with poles on top of the marking, which lead to a significant drop in the amount of vehicles ignoring marking. Medium or low demand turns did not show high percentages of vehicles ignoring markings. No significant difference between heavy vehicles and passenger cars could be found. The gathered information can only give an impression on driver behaviors that are to be excepted at large, high demand intersections. For detailed analysis further research has to be done. Nevertheless, the first analysis shows a trend, that the physical channelization used in Germany leads to more consistent trajectories.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The objective of this paper is to research driver behavior at pavement markings at signalized intersections – in a comparison of Japan and Germany – to give a recommendation on future applications of pavement markings. Both industrialized countries have a comparably well-developed traffic infrastructure. As similar markings suggest similar driver behaviors, differences lead to pavement markings that might influence driver behavior differently. Focus is set on pavement markings at left turns in Japan, which is equivalent to right turns in Germany. Here, especially in Nagoya city, curb markings and channelization markings are extensively used at large, high demand intersections. Driver behavior was observed from video data at five sites, stating if vehicles were moving according to pavement markings or ignoring markings. Furthermore, video data from one turn was used to plot drivers trajectories and get differences in vehicle types and speed profiles. Speed profiles show that hardly any free flow vehicles ignore pavement markings. Vehicles start cutting markings when leading vehicles slow down e.g. to let pedestrians pass. Here following vehicles try to pass. At both observed turns featured with curb markings, vehicles ignored this type of marking. Leading to the impression that drivers rather focus on something solid – e.g. the curb – than markings. A high percentage of drivers ignored the channelization markings at large, high demand turns. One observed turn was feature with poles on top of the marking, which lead to a significant drop in the amount of vehicles ignoring marking. Medium or low demand turns did not show high percentages of vehicles ignoring markings. No significant difference between heavy vehicles and passenger cars could be found. The gathered information can only give an impression on driver behaviors that are to be excepted at large, high demand intersections. For detailed analysis further research has to be done. Nevertheless, the first analysis shows a trend, that the physical channelization used in Germany leads to more consistent trajectories.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The objective of this paper is to research driver behavior at pavement markings at signalized intersections – in a comparison of Japan and Germany – to give a recommendation on future applications of pavement markings. Both industrialized countries have a comparably well-developed traffic infrastructure. As similar markings suggest similar driver behaviors, differences lead to pavement markings that might influence driver behavior differently. Focus is set on pavement markings at left turns in Japan, which is equivalent to right turns in Germany. Here, especially in Nagoya city, curb markings and channelization markings are extensively used at large, high demand intersections. Driver behavior was observed from video data at five sites, stating if vehicles were moving according to pavement markings or ignoring markings. Furthermore, video data from one turn was used to plot drivers trajectories and get differences in vehicle types and speed profiles. Speed profiles show that hardly any free flow vehicles ignore pavement markings. Vehicles start cutting markings when leading vehicles slow down e.g. to let pedestrians pass. Here following vehicles try to pass. At both observed turns featured with curb markings, vehicles ignored this type of marking. Leading to the impression that drivers rather focus on something solid – e.g. the curb – than markings. A high percentage of drivers ignored the channelization markings at large, high demand turns. One observed turn was feature with poles on top of the marking, which lead to a significant drop in the amount of vehicles ignoring marking. Medium or low demand turns did not show high percentages of vehicles ignoring markings. No significant difference between heavy vehicles and passenger cars could be found. The gathered information can only give an impression on driver behaviors that are to be excepted at large, high demand intersections. For detailed analysis further research has to be done. Nevertheless, the first analysis shows a trend, that the physical channelization used in Germany leads to more consistent trajectories.

Key concepts: Intersection (aeronautics), Channelized, Transport engineering, Focus (optics), Engineering, Computer science, Telecommunications, Physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Impact of Road Markings and Intersection Layout on the Behavior of Turning Vehicles at Signalized Intersections — Research Paper | ScholarLens