2006•DiametrosOpen access

Does eco-aesthetics exist?

Krystyna Wilkoszewska

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

It is difficult to answer the question posed in the title. Aesthetics that makes use of ecological inspirations is in the process of coming to be; its final version will require a reworking of traditional philosophy and the aesthetics of nature. I present two examples of such work in current aesthetics; the first is found in American circles, the second in the German tradition: 1. Arnold Berleant’s project of environmental aesthetics, arising from a criticism of Kant’s concept of the disinterestedness of aesthetic experience and tending toward a model of engaged aesthetics; 2. Gernot Bohm’s proposal of a new philosophy and aesthetics of nature. I criticize both proposals, pointing to difficulties in reconciling the traditional understanding of such concepts as nature, aesthetics, and experience with the requirements of an ecological worldview that grants man a place in the world that differs from that provided him by Cartesian thought.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It is difficult to answer the question posed in the title. Aesthetics that makes use of ecological inspirations is in the process of coming to be; its final version will require a reworking of traditional philosophy and the aesthetics of nature. I present two examples of such work in current aesthetics; the first is found in American circles, the second in the German tradition: 1. Arnold Berleant’s project of environmental aesthetics, arising from a criticism of Kant’s concept of the disinterestedness of aesthetic experience and tending toward a model of engaged aesthetics; 2. Gernot Bohm’s proposal of a new philosophy and aesthetics of nature. I criticize both proposals, pointing to difficulties in reconciling the traditional understanding of such concepts as nature, aesthetics, and experience with the requirements of an ecological worldview that grants man a place in the world that differs from that provided him by Cartesian thought.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It is difficult to answer the question posed in the title. Aesthetics that makes use of ecological inspirations is in the process of coming to be; its final version will require a reworking of traditional philosophy and the aesthetics of nature. I present two examples of such work in current aesthetics; the first is found in American circles, the second in the German tradition: 1. Arnold Berleant’s project of environmental aesthetics, arising from a criticism of Kant’s concept of the disinterestedness of aesthetic experience and tending toward a model of engaged aesthetics; 2. Gernot Bohm’s proposal of a new philosophy and aesthetics of nature. I criticize both proposals, pointing to difficulties in reconciling the traditional understanding of such concepts as nature, aesthetics, and experience with the requirements of an ecological worldview that grants man a place in the world that differs from that provided him by Cartesian thought.

Key concepts: Aesthetics, Criticism, Everyday Aesthetics, German, Aesthetic experience, Philosophy, Epistemology, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Does eco-aesthetics exist? — Research Paper | ScholarLens