2018Unpublished venueRequires access

Hacking as sympoiesis

David Chandler

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

For the first two modes of governance in the Anthropocene the task is that of managing or preventing the unfolding of the Anthropocene. For Mapping approaches, governance problems are to be addressed through the reactive or adaptive governance of path-dependencies and feedback loops on the assumption that the interconnections between human actions and their recursive effects can be seen, understood and acted upon. For the sciences of Sensing, these responsivities are focused not on non-linear causal chains of interconnection but on correlations, which enable the datafication of the world, so that effects can be seen in their emergence. For the imaginary of these governance modes based on the ontopolitical assumptions of the Anthropocene, complexity does just enough to problematise modernist understandings of universal knowledge and linear causality while still retaining the human subject able to guide and manipulate processes, if not govern them directly, though techniques and technologies of tracing, mapping and sensing.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

For the first two modes of governance in the Anthropocene the task is that of managing or preventing the unfolding of the Anthropocene. For Mapping approaches, governance problems are to be addressed through the reactive or adaptive governance of path-dependencies and feedback loops on the assumption that the interconnections between human actions and their recursive effects can be seen, understood and acted upon. For the sciences of Sensing, these responsivities are focused not on non-linear causal chains of interconnection but on correlations, which enable the datafication of the world, so that effects can be seen in their emergence. For the imaginary of these governance modes based on the ontopolitical assumptions of the Anthropocene, complexity does just enough to problematise modernist understandings of universal knowledge and linear causality while still retaining the human subject able to guide and manipulate processes, if not govern them directly, though techniques and technologies of tracing, mapping and sensing.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

For the first two modes of governance in the Anthropocene the task is that of managing or preventing the unfolding of the Anthropocene. For Mapping approaches, governance problems are to be addressed through the reactive or adaptive governance of path-dependencies and feedback loops on the assumption that the interconnections between human actions and their recursive effects can be seen, understood and acted upon. For the sciences of Sensing, these responsivities are focused not on non-linear causal chains of interconnection but on correlations, which enable the datafication of the world, so that effects can be seen in their emergence. For the imaginary of these governance modes based on the ontopolitical assumptions of the Anthropocene, complexity does just enough to problematise modernist understandings of universal knowledge and linear causality while still retaining the human subject able to guide and manipulate processes, if not govern them directly, though techniques and technologies of tracing, mapping and sensing.

Key concepts: Hacker, Computer science, Computer security

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Hacking as sympoiesis — Research Paper | ScholarLens