2018AIAA JournalOpen access

Unsteady Lift and Moment of a Periodically Plunging Airfoil

Nicola Chiereghin, David Cleaver, Ismet Gursul

Open full text 43 citations

Abstract

To simulate the effects of gusts and maneuvers, lift, moment, and flow measurements are presented for a periodically plunging airfoil at a Reynolds number of 20,000 over a wide range of reduced frequency , amplitude , and mean angle of attack (0–20 deg). For this parameter range, the maximum lift in the cycle is determined by the circulatory lift, regardless of whether a leading-edge vortex (LEV) is formed or not, whereas the maximum nose-down moment is determined by the competition between the added mass and the arrival of the LEV near the trailing edge. The LEV generally increases the mean lift and decreases the mean moment. This increase, which is not predicted well by the reduced-order models, correlates with the maximum effective angle of attack of the motion, rather than the Strouhal number. In contrast, the amplitude and phase of lift are predicted well by the Theodorsen theory (Theodorsen, T., “General Theory of Aerodynamic Instability and the Mechanics of Flutter,” NACA TR 496, 1949), whether LEVs are present or not. Hence, LEVs have a minimal effect on the fluctuating lift. However, the amplitude of the pitching moment is not predicted well by the Theodorsen theory, if LEVs are present. The competition between the added mass and the LEV causes the nonmonotonic variation of the moment amplitude as a function of reduced frequency.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To simulate the effects of gusts and maneuvers, lift, moment, and flow measurements are presented for a periodically plunging airfoil at a Reynolds number of 20,000 over a wide range of reduced frequency , amplitude , and mean angle of attack (0–20 deg). For this parameter range, the maximum lift in the cycle is determined by the circulatory lift, regardless of whether a leading-edge vortex (LEV) is formed or not, whereas the maximum nose-down moment is determined by the competition between the added mass and the arrival of the LEV near the trailing edge. The LEV generally increases the mean lift and decreases the mean moment. This increase, which is not predicted well by the reduced-order models, correlates with the maximum effective angle of attack of the motion, rather than the Strouhal number. In contrast, the amplitude and phase of lift are predicted well by the Theodorsen theory (Theodorsen, T., “General Theory of Aerodynamic Instability and the Mechanics of Flutter,” NACA TR 496, 1949), whether LEVs are present or not. Hence, LEVs have a minimal effect on the fluctuating lift. However, the amplitude of the pitching moment is not predicted well by the Theodorsen theory, if LEVs are present. The competition between the added mass and the LEV causes the nonmonotonic variation of the moment amplitude as a function of reduced frequency.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 43 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To simulate the effects of gusts and maneuvers, lift, moment, and flow measurements are presented for a periodically plunging airfoil at a Reynolds number of 20,000 over a wide range of reduced frequency , amplitude , and mean angle of attack (0–20 deg). For this parameter range, the maximum lift in the cycle is determined by the circulatory lift, regardless of whether a leading-edge vortex (LEV) is formed or not, whereas the maximum nose-down moment is determined by the competition between the added mass and the arrival of the LEV near the trailing edge. The LEV generally increases the mean lift and decreases the mean moment. This increase, which is not predicted well by the reduced-order models, correlates with the maximum effective angle of attack of the motion, rather than the Strouhal number. In contrast, the amplitude and phase of lift are predicted well by the Theodorsen theory (Theodorsen, T., “General Theory of Aerodynamic Instability and the Mechanics of Flutter,” NACA TR 496, 1949), whether LEVs are present or not. Hence, LEVs have a minimal effect on the fluctuating lift. However, the amplitude of the pitching moment is not predicted well by the Theodorsen theory, if LEVs are present. The competition between the added mass and the LEV causes the nonmonotonic variation of the moment amplitude as a function of reduced frequency.

Key concepts: Strouhal number, Pitching moment, Airfoil, Aerodynamic center, Mechanics, Reduced frequency, Lift (data mining), Angle of attack

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Unsteady Lift and Moment of a Periodically Plunging Airfoil — Research Paper | ScholarLens