2018Unpublished venueRequires access

Sleep clinical record and polysomnography scores in adolescents with sleep disordered breathing

Melania Evangelisti, Martina Forlani, Marco Pozzo, Maria Elena Liverani, Maria Pia Villa

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Introduction: According to the update of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) manual either paediatric or adult scoring rules may be used for adolescents ages 13 -18 years but there are no definitive recommendations on which respiratory scoring rules are most appropriate. Objectives: compare polysomnographic parameters in a group of adolescents with suspected sleep disordered breathing (SDB), using both pediatric and adult respiratory scoring criteria and to identify the main clinical factors associated with obstructive sleep apnoea severity by sleep clinical record (SCR). Methods: A prospective study was conducted on adolescents referred for SDB between 2015-2017. Every patients performed clinical evaluation, SCR and overnight polysomnography. Data were scored using both adult and pediatric AASM criteria. Results: Seventy-one adolescents were studied (mean age 14.2± 1.6 years, 68.3 % were male, 25.4% were obese). SCR was positive in 29 (40.8%) patients. The difference between AHI scored by pediatric (median 1.0[0.6–2.1]/h) and adult (median 0.1[0.4 – 0.9]/h) criteria was statistically significant (p=0.000). There was a significant rate of discordance for OSAS classification, 26 pediatric OSAS vs 6 adult OSAS (p=0.01). All patients with OSAS had a positive SCR and main clinical findings OSA-related were dento-skeletal malocclusion (OR 9.6, 95% CI 2.3-39.8, p=0.001), nasal septal deviation (OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.1-18.6, p=0.02) and obesity (OR4.0, 95% CI 1.1-14.4, p=0.02). Conclusions: we suggest to use the pediatric scoring rules in adolescents with SDB, in order to identify a correct number of patients with OSAS.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction: According to the update of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) manual either paediatric or adult scoring rules may be used for adolescents ages 13 -18 years but there are no definitive recommendations on which respiratory scoring rules are most appropriate. Objectives: compare polysomnographic parameters in a group of adolescents with suspected sleep disordered breathing (SDB), using both pediatric and adult respiratory scoring criteria and to identify the main clinical factors associated with obstructive sleep apnoea severity by sleep clinical record (SCR). Methods: A prospective study was conducted on adolescents referred for SDB between 2015-2017. Every patients performed clinical evaluation, SCR and overnight polysomnography. Data were scored using both adult and pediatric AASM criteria. Results: Seventy-one adolescents were studied (mean age 14.2± 1.6 years, 68.3 % were male, 25.4% were obese). SCR was positive in 29 (40.8%) patients. The difference between AHI scored by pediatric (median 1.0[0.6–2.1]/h) and adult (median 0.1[0.4 – 0.9]/h) criteria was statistically significant (p=0.000). There was a significant rate of discordance for OSAS classification, 26 pediatric OSAS vs 6 adult OSAS (p=0.01). All patients with OSAS had a positive SCR and main clinical findings OSA-related were dento-skeletal malocclusion (OR 9.6, 95% CI 2.3-39.8, p=0.001), nasal septal deviation (OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.1-18.6, p=0.02) and obesity (OR4.0, 95% CI 1.1-14.4, p=0.02). Conclusions: we suggest to use the pediatric scoring rules in adolescents with SDB, in order to identify a correct number of patients with OSAS.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction: According to the update of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) manual either paediatric or adult scoring rules may be used for adolescents ages 13 -18 years but there are no definitive recommendations on which respiratory scoring rules are most appropriate. Objectives: compare polysomnographic parameters in a group of adolescents with suspected sleep disordered breathing (SDB), using both pediatric and adult respiratory scoring criteria and to identify the main clinical factors associated with obstructive sleep apnoea severity by sleep clinical record (SCR). Methods: A prospective study was conducted on adolescents referred for SDB between 2015-2017. Every patients performed clinical evaluation, SCR and overnight polysomnography. Data were scored using both adult and pediatric AASM criteria. Results: Seventy-one adolescents were studied (mean age 14.2± 1.6 years, 68.3 % were male, 25.4% were obese). SCR was positive in 29 (40.8%) patients. The difference between AHI scored by pediatric (median 1.0[0.6–2.1]/h) and adult (median 0.1[0.4 – 0.9]/h) criteria was statistically significant (p=0.000). There was a significant rate of discordance for OSAS classification, 26 pediatric OSAS vs 6 adult OSAS (p=0.01). All patients with OSAS had a positive SCR and main clinical findings OSA-related were dento-skeletal malocclusion (OR 9.6, 95% CI 2.3-39.8, p=0.001), nasal septal deviation (OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.1-18.6, p=0.02) and obesity (OR4.0, 95% CI 1.1-14.4, p=0.02). Conclusions: we suggest to use the pediatric scoring rules in adolescents with SDB, in order to identify a correct number of patients with OSAS.

Key concepts: Medicine, Polysomnography, Sleep medicine, Sleep study, Pediatrics, Sleep (system call), Sleep disordered breathing, Prospective cohort study

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sleep clinical record and polysomnography scores in adolescents with sleep disordered breathing — Research Paper | ScholarLens