2018Unpublished venueRequires access

The African Commission, the African Court on Human Rights and the realisation of the right to development

Serges Djoyou Kamga

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter focuses exclusively on two of these institutions: Firstly, the African Commission because as the oldest body for the protection of human rights in Africa, it &s;has fully asserted its mandate and entrenched its operations&s; in advancing human rights in general and specifically right to development (RTD). Secondly, the African Court that has recently rendered its first judgement on the RTD in the Ogiek case. It discusses as they are the only two bodies that have made a significant difference in addressing the RTD, at least in terms of standard setting. The chapter examines the extent to which the African Commission protects and promotes the RTD in Africa. It focuses on the protective mandate of the Commission with special attention to the RTD. The chapter explores the promotional mandate of the Commission in respect of the RTD. The Communication argues that the right to food is implicit in the African Charter, in such provisions as the right to life.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter focuses exclusively on two of these institutions: Firstly, the African Commission because as the oldest body for the protection of human rights in Africa, it &s;has fully asserted its mandate and entrenched its operations&s; in advancing human rights in general and specifically right to development (RTD). Secondly, the African Court that has recently rendered its first judgement on the RTD in the Ogiek case. It discusses as they are the only two bodies that have made a significant difference in addressing the RTD, at least in terms of standard setting. The chapter examines the extent to which the African Commission protects and promotes the RTD in Africa. It focuses on the protective mandate of the Commission with special attention to the RTD. The chapter explores the promotional mandate of the Commission in respect of the RTD. The Communication argues that the right to food is implicit in the African Charter, in such provisions as the right to life.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter focuses exclusively on two of these institutions: Firstly, the African Commission because as the oldest body for the protection of human rights in Africa, it &s;has fully asserted its mandate and entrenched its operations&s; in advancing human rights in general and specifically right to development (RTD). Secondly, the African Court that has recently rendered its first judgement on the RTD in the Ogiek case. It discusses as they are the only two bodies that have made a significant difference in addressing the RTD, at least in terms of standard setting. The chapter examines the extent to which the African Commission protects and promotes the RTD in Africa. It focuses on the protective mandate of the Commission with special attention to the RTD. The chapter explores the promotional mandate of the Commission in respect of the RTD. The Communication argues that the right to food is implicit in the African Charter, in such provisions as the right to life.

Key concepts: Realisation, Commission, Right to development, Political science, Human rights, Law, Physics, Quantum mechanics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The African Commission, the African Court on Human Rights and the realisation of the right to development — Research Paper | ScholarLens