2017Unpublished venueRequires access

Quine’s philosophy of language

Gary Kemp

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Quine’s position is motivated by his scientific naturalism, by the position that a serious understanding of linguistic phenomena should not uncritically help itself to the idea of meaning and related concepts. The thought experiment of radical translation involves translation into English of a previously unknown language; this clarifies what naturalism requires and prohibits, and affords a way of finding out the objective standing of the idea of cognitive meaning. He concludes that translation is indeterminate; there is no one right way to portray a person’s language. In dismissing meaning from the arsenal of naturalistic concepts, Quine in effect dismisses analyticity, which is conceived to be truth due solely to meanings of words. In holism, Quine sketches an alternative theory of knowledge that dispenses with the concept: Human knowledge is like a loose-jointed web of belief, not like a vertical structure built upon a foundation of experiential statements. Ordinary expressions are often vague and imprecise; Quine’s response is not to find out better what they mean but, if the need is felt for some theoretical purpose, to propose replacements which serve the necessary functions without those problems.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Quine’s position is motivated by his scientific naturalism, by the position that a serious understanding of linguistic phenomena should not uncritically help itself to the idea of meaning and related concepts. The thought experiment of radical translation involves translation into English of a previously unknown language; this clarifies what naturalism requires and prohibits, and affords a way of finding out the objective standing of the idea of cognitive meaning. He concludes that translation is indeterminate; there is no one right way to portray a person’s language. In dismissing meaning from the arsenal of naturalistic concepts, Quine in effect dismisses analyticity, which is conceived to be truth due solely to meanings of words. In holism, Quine sketches an alternative theory of knowledge that dispenses with the concept: Human knowledge is like a loose-jointed web of belief, not like a vertical structure built upon a foundation of experiential statements. Ordinary expressions are often vague and imprecise; Quine’s response is not to find out better what they mean but, if the need is felt for some theoretical purpose, to propose replacements which serve the necessary functions without those problems.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Quine’s position is motivated by his scientific naturalism, by the position that a serious understanding of linguistic phenomena should not uncritically help itself to the idea of meaning and related concepts. The thought experiment of radical translation involves translation into English of a previously unknown language; this clarifies what naturalism requires and prohibits, and affords a way of finding out the objective standing of the idea of cognitive meaning. He concludes that translation is indeterminate; there is no one right way to portray a person’s language. In dismissing meaning from the arsenal of naturalistic concepts, Quine in effect dismisses analyticity, which is conceived to be truth due solely to meanings of words. In holism, Quine sketches an alternative theory of knowledge that dispenses with the concept: Human knowledge is like a loose-jointed web of belief, not like a vertical structure built upon a foundation of experiential statements. Ordinary expressions are often vague and imprecise; Quine’s response is not to find out better what they mean but, if the need is felt for some theoretical purpose, to propose replacements which serve the necessary functions without those problems.

Key concepts: Quine, Philosophy, Linguistics, Philosophy of language, Epistemology, Metaphysics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Quine’s philosophy of language — Research Paper | ScholarLens