2018•Unpublished venueRequires access

Defining Regionalism and Approaches to Regionalism

David Y. Miller

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter deals specifically with identifying and exploring the primary ways in which local governments are engaging in regional activities. The primary explanation for the paradox results moving from thinking about a paradigm centered on government to one centered on governing or governance. Governing is the act of public decision-making and is no longer the exclusive domain of governments. Developing democratic decision-making rules has proved to be the most difficult challenge facing the organizations. The most frequently used innovation in decision-making rules is the development of weighted voting structures that reflect the distribution of population and market value within a metropolitan area. In the process of a transition, the urban counties serve to the regionalizing of metropolitan America. The history of the International City/County Management Association (ICMA) captures the emergence of the urban county.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter deals specifically with identifying and exploring the primary ways in which local governments are engaging in regional activities. The primary explanation for the paradox results moving from thinking about a paradigm centered on government to one centered on governing or governance. Governing is the act of public decision-making and is no longer the exclusive domain of governments. Developing democratic decision-making rules has proved to be the most difficult challenge facing the organizations. The most frequently used innovation in decision-making rules is the development of weighted voting structures that reflect the distribution of population and market value within a metropolitan area. In the process of a transition, the urban counties serve to the regionalizing of metropolitan America. The history of the International City/County Management Association (ICMA) captures the emergence of the urban county.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter deals specifically with identifying and exploring the primary ways in which local governments are engaging in regional activities. The primary explanation for the paradox results moving from thinking about a paradigm centered on government to one centered on governing or governance. Governing is the act of public decision-making and is no longer the exclusive domain of governments. Developing democratic decision-making rules has proved to be the most difficult challenge facing the organizations. The most frequently used innovation in decision-making rules is the development of weighted voting structures that reflect the distribution of population and market value within a metropolitan area. In the process of a transition, the urban counties serve to the regionalizing of metropolitan America. The history of the International City/County Management Association (ICMA) captures the emergence of the urban county.

Key concepts: Regionalism (politics), Political science, Economic geography, Geography, Politics, Law, Democracy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Defining Regionalism and Approaches to Regionalism — Research Paper | ScholarLens