2016Unpublished venueRequires access

Judicial reform in China

Qianfan Zhang

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

This chapter highlights the major impediments that have for decades prevented China's courts from developing into modern professional judiciary, and reviews previous judicial reforms aimed at removing some of these impediments. It describes the main initiatives of new judicial reform and provides brief analysis of the possibility of its success. Since 1999, when the Supreme People's Court (SPC) published the First Outline for a Five-Year Reform of the People's Court, judicial reform has been a spotlight in China's legal community, but achievements in judicial practice have fallen far short of academic and social expectations. Due to lack of basic separation of powers, China's courts were, and to large extent still are, plagued by the so-called judicial syndrome. There are four key aspects to this syndrome, summarized as follows: low professional quality; lack of institutional independence and heavy reliance on local party-governments; lack of individual independence of judges within the courts; and rampant judicial corruption that adds constraints to judicial reform.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter highlights the major impediments that have for decades prevented China's courts from developing into modern professional judiciary, and reviews previous judicial reforms aimed at removing some of these impediments. It describes the main initiatives of new judicial reform and provides brief analysis of the possibility of its success. Since 1999, when the Supreme People's Court (SPC) published the First Outline for a Five-Year Reform of the People's Court, judicial reform has been a spotlight in China's legal community, but achievements in judicial practice have fallen far short of academic and social expectations. Due to lack of basic separation of powers, China's courts were, and to large extent still are, plagued by the so-called judicial syndrome. There are four key aspects to this syndrome, summarized as follows: low professional quality; lack of institutional independence and heavy reliance on local party-governments; lack of individual independence of judges within the courts; and rampant judicial corruption that adds constraints to judicial reform.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter highlights the major impediments that have for decades prevented China's courts from developing into modern professional judiciary, and reviews previous judicial reforms aimed at removing some of these impediments. It describes the main initiatives of new judicial reform and provides brief analysis of the possibility of its success. Since 1999, when the Supreme People's Court (SPC) published the First Outline for a Five-Year Reform of the People's Court, judicial reform has been a spotlight in China's legal community, but achievements in judicial practice have fallen far short of academic and social expectations. Due to lack of basic separation of powers, China's courts were, and to large extent still are, plagued by the so-called judicial syndrome. There are four key aspects to this syndrome, summarized as follows: low professional quality; lack of institutional independence and heavy reliance on local party-governments; lack of individual independence of judges within the courts; and rampant judicial corruption that adds constraints to judicial reform.

Key concepts: China, Political science, Judicial reform, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Judicial reform in China — Research Paper | ScholarLens