2016•Unpublished venueRequires access

Development projects and indigenous peoples’ land

Mauro Barelli

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

This chapter examines the legal significance and implications of the flexible approach to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) that has recently gained increasing recognition at the international level. It clarifies the meaning of the first three components of FPIC, namely &s;free&s;, &s;prior&s; and &s;informed&s;. The chapter discusses the meaning of &s;consent&s;, examining the drafting history of Article 32(2) and placing it within the normative context of the Declaration. It then proceeds to highlight the way in which other international instruments and bodies have tackled the question of FPIC and development projects on indigenous lands. Article 32(2) of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) recognizes that indigenous peoples should be consulted before states may launch or authorize development projects on their lands. Finally, the chapter draws some conclusions as to the scope and value of FPIC in the context of the indigenous rights regime.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter examines the legal significance and implications of the flexible approach to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) that has recently gained increasing recognition at the international level. It clarifies the meaning of the first three components of FPIC, namely &s;free&s;, &s;prior&s; and &s;informed&s;. The chapter discusses the meaning of &s;consent&s;, examining the drafting history of Article 32(2) and placing it within the normative context of the Declaration. It then proceeds to highlight the way in which other international instruments and bodies have tackled the question of FPIC and development projects on indigenous lands. Article 32(2) of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) recognizes that indigenous peoples should be consulted before states may launch or authorize development projects on their lands. Finally, the chapter draws some conclusions as to the scope and value of FPIC in the context of the indigenous rights regime.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter examines the legal significance and implications of the flexible approach to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) that has recently gained increasing recognition at the international level. It clarifies the meaning of the first three components of FPIC, namely &s;free&s;, &s;prior&s; and &s;informed&s;. The chapter discusses the meaning of &s;consent&s;, examining the drafting history of Article 32(2) and placing it within the normative context of the Declaration. It then proceeds to highlight the way in which other international instruments and bodies have tackled the question of FPIC and development projects on indigenous lands. Article 32(2) of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) recognizes that indigenous peoples should be consulted before states may launch or authorize development projects on their lands. Finally, the chapter draws some conclusions as to the scope and value of FPIC in the context of the indigenous rights regime.

Key concepts: Indigenous, Geography, Environmental planning, Agroforestry, Political science, Environmental science, Ecology, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Development projects and indigenous peoples’ land — Research Paper | ScholarLens