The Politics of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership: Theory and Practice
Ricardo Gómez
Abstract
Ricardo Gómez
Abstract
This chapter attempts to conceptually &s;unpack&s; the European Union&s;s (EU) Mediterranean strategy by employing different theoretical perspectives to explain the development of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership (EMP). It considers the characteristics of the Euro-Mediterranean initiative as a policy area, comparing it with the Union&s;s approach to eastern enlargement and setting it in the wider context of Euro-Mediterranean relations. Southern member states had more intense economic and security interests in the region than their northern, non-Mediterranean counterparts. The chapter analyses the impact of intergovernmental politics on the EMP. It engages with the institutionalist claim that institutions have a significant role in determining policy outcomes, and have policy &s;preferences&s; in their own right. The chapter focuses on the roles of the Commission, the European Parliament, the Council Presidency and the Council Secretariat. A strong case exists to use theory that captures the interplay between domestic interests and the behaviour of governments in the EU policy-making process.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This chapter attempts to conceptually &s;unpack&s; the European Union&s;s (EU) Mediterranean strategy by employing different theoretical perspectives to explain the development of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership (EMP). It considers the characteristics of the Euro-Mediterranean initiative as a policy area, comparing it with the Union&s;s approach to eastern enlargement and setting it in the wider context of Euro-Mediterranean relations. Southern member states had more intense economic and security interests in the region than their northern, non-Mediterranean counterparts. The chapter analyses the impact of intergovernmental politics on the EMP. It engages with the institutionalist claim that institutions have a significant role in determining policy outcomes, and have policy &s;preferences&s; in their own right. The chapter focuses on the roles of the Commission, the European Parliament, the Council Presidency and the Council Secretariat. A strong case exists to use theory that captures the interplay between domestic interests and the behaviour of governments in the EU policy-making process.
Key concepts: General partnership, Politics, Mediterranean climate, Political science, Geography, Archaeology, Law