2018Neuropsychiatric Disease and TreatmentOpen access

Association between CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism and ischemic stroke susceptibility: a meta-analysis based on 5,277 subjects

Yanqiong Wu, Shi-Yan Cheng, Xian-cheng Xu, Wen‐Cui Li

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Previous epidemiological studies have suggested that CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism plays an important role in ischemic stroke (IS) risk, but the results were inconsistent. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to determine the association between CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism and IS susceptibility. Methods: Online databases were searched from inception up to July 1, 2018, for studies concerning CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism and its association with IS susceptibility. ORs and corresponding 95% CIs were calculated in the genetic models of each polymorphism locus with Stata Version 14.0. Furthermore, heterogeneity, meta-regression, accumulative analyses, sensitivity analyses, and publication bias were examined. Results: Overall, 10 observed studies involving 5,277 subjects were included in this meta-analysis on CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism. Generally, no significant associations were found between CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism and IS risk (allele contrast of T vs C: OR =1.03, 95% CI =0.96–1.12, P =0.41, I 2 =27.8%; co-dominant models of CT vs CC: OR =1.01, 95% CI =0.81–1.25, P =0.95, I 2 =51.9%; co-dominant models of TT vs CC: OR =1.04, 95% CI =0.89–1.22, P =0.62, I 2 =25.1%; dominant model of CT + TT vs CC: OR =1.02, 95% CI =0.84–1.25, P =0.82, I 2 =51.4%; recessive model of TT vs CC + CT: OR =1.07, 95% CI =0.95–1.22, P =0.28, I 2 =0%), similar to the results in the subgroup analysis. Conclusion: The current evidence indicated that CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism was not a critical risk factor for IS development. Keywords: CD14, ischemic stroke, polymorphism

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction: Previous epidemiological studies have suggested that CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism plays an important role in ischemic stroke (IS) risk, but the results were inconsistent. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to determine the association between CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism and IS susceptibility. Methods: Online databases were searched from inception up to July 1, 2018, for studies concerning CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism and its association with IS susceptibility. ORs and corresponding 95% CIs were calculated in the genetic models of each polymorphism locus with Stata Version 14.0. Furthermore, heterogeneity, meta-regression, accumulative analyses, sensitivity analyses, and publication bias were examined. Results: Overall, 10 observed studies involving 5,277 subjects were included in this meta-analysis on CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism. Generally, no significant associations were found between CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism and IS risk (allele contrast of T vs C: OR =1.03, 95% CI =0.96–1.12, P =0.41, I 2 =27.8%; co-dominant models of CT vs CC: OR =1.01, 95% CI =0.81–1.25, P =0.95, I 2 =51.9%; co-dominant models of TT vs CC: OR =1.04, 95% CI =0.89–1.22, P =0.62, I 2 =25.1%; dominant model of CT + TT vs CC: OR =1.02, 95% CI =0.84–1.25, P =0.82, I 2 =51.4%; recessive model of TT vs CC + CT: OR =1.07, 95% CI =0.95–1.22, P =0.28, I 2 =0%), similar to the results in the subgroup analysis. Conclusion: The current evidence indicated that CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism was not a critical risk factor for IS development. Keywords: CD14, ischemic stroke, polymorphism

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction: Previous epidemiological studies have suggested that CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism plays an important role in ischemic stroke (IS) risk, but the results were inconsistent. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to determine the association between CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism and IS susceptibility. Methods: Online databases were searched from inception up to July 1, 2018, for studies concerning CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism and its association with IS susceptibility. ORs and corresponding 95% CIs were calculated in the genetic models of each polymorphism locus with Stata Version 14.0. Furthermore, heterogeneity, meta-regression, accumulative analyses, sensitivity analyses, and publication bias were examined. Results: Overall, 10 observed studies involving 5,277 subjects were included in this meta-analysis on CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism. Generally, no significant associations were found between CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism and IS risk (allele contrast of T vs C: OR =1.03, 95% CI =0.96–1.12, P =0.41, I 2 =27.8%; co-dominant models of CT vs CC: OR =1.01, 95% CI =0.81–1.25, P =0.95, I 2 =51.9%; co-dominant models of TT vs CC: OR =1.04, 95% CI =0.89–1.22, P =0.62, I 2 =25.1%; dominant model of CT + TT vs CC: OR =1.02, 95% CI =0.84–1.25, P =0.82, I 2 =51.4%; recessive model of TT vs CC + CT: OR =1.07, 95% CI =0.95–1.22, P =0.28, I 2 =0%), similar to the results in the subgroup analysis. Conclusion: The current evidence indicated that CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism was not a critical risk factor for IS development. Keywords: CD14, ischemic stroke, polymorphism

Key concepts: Medicine, Internal medicine, Meta-analysis, Gastroenterology, Subgroup analysis, Genetic model, Allele, Publication bias

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Association between CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism and ischemic stroke susceptibility: a meta-analysis based on 5,277 subjects — Research Paper | ScholarLens