Association between CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism and ischemic stroke susceptibility: a meta-analysis based on 5,277 subjects
Yanqiong Wu, Shi-Yan Cheng, Xian-cheng Xu, Wen‐Cui Li
Abstract
Open-access reader
Yanqiong Wu, Shi-Yan Cheng, Xian-cheng Xu, Wen‐Cui Li
Abstract
Open-access reader
Introduction: Previous epidemiological studies have suggested that CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism plays an important role in ischemic stroke (IS) risk, but the results were inconsistent. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to determine the association between CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism and IS susceptibility. Methods: Online databases were searched from inception up to July 1, 2018, for studies concerning CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism and its association with IS susceptibility. ORs and corresponding 95% CIs were calculated in the genetic models of each polymorphism locus with Stata Version 14.0. Furthermore, heterogeneity, meta-regression, accumulative analyses, sensitivity analyses, and publication bias were examined. Results: Overall, 10 observed studies involving 5,277 subjects were included in this meta-analysis on CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism. Generally, no significant associations were found between CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism and IS risk (allele contrast of T vs C: OR =1.03, 95% CI =0.96–1.12, P =0.41, I 2 =27.8%; co-dominant models of CT vs CC: OR =1.01, 95% CI =0.81–1.25, P =0.95, I 2 =51.9%; co-dominant models of TT vs CC: OR =1.04, 95% CI =0.89–1.22, P =0.62, I 2 =25.1%; dominant model of CT + TT vs CC: OR =1.02, 95% CI =0.84–1.25, P =0.82, I 2 =51.4%; recessive model of TT vs CC + CT: OR =1.07, 95% CI =0.95–1.22, P =0.28, I 2 =0%), similar to the results in the subgroup analysis. Conclusion: The current evidence indicated that CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism was not a critical risk factor for IS development. Keywords: CD14, ischemic stroke, polymorphism
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Introduction: Previous epidemiological studies have suggested that CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism plays an important role in ischemic stroke (IS) risk, but the results were inconsistent. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to determine the association between CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism and IS susceptibility. Methods: Online databases were searched from inception up to July 1, 2018, for studies concerning CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism and its association with IS susceptibility. ORs and corresponding 95% CIs were calculated in the genetic models of each polymorphism locus with Stata Version 14.0. Furthermore, heterogeneity, meta-regression, accumulative analyses, sensitivity analyses, and publication bias were examined. Results: Overall, 10 observed studies involving 5,277 subjects were included in this meta-analysis on CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism. Generally, no significant associations were found between CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism and IS risk (allele contrast of T vs C: OR =1.03, 95% CI =0.96–1.12, P =0.41, I 2 =27.8%; co-dominant models of CT vs CC: OR =1.01, 95% CI =0.81–1.25, P =0.95, I 2 =51.9%; co-dominant models of TT vs CC: OR =1.04, 95% CI =0.89–1.22, P =0.62, I 2 =25.1%; dominant model of CT + TT vs CC: OR =1.02, 95% CI =0.84–1.25, P =0.82, I 2 =51.4%; recessive model of TT vs CC + CT: OR =1.07, 95% CI =0.95–1.22, P =0.28, I 2 =0%), similar to the results in the subgroup analysis. Conclusion: The current evidence indicated that CD14 rs2569190 C>T polymorphism was not a critical risk factor for IS development. Keywords: CD14, ischemic stroke, polymorphism
Key concepts: Medicine, Internal medicine, Meta-analysis, Gastroenterology, Subgroup analysis, Genetic model, Allele, Publication bias