2018Unpublished venueRequires access

Immigration and Citizenship

Jessie Blackbourn, Deniz Kayis, Nicola McGarrity

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

One of the defining features of State counter-terrorism responses to the foreign terrorist fighters phenomenon has been the enactment and amendment of immigration and citizenship laws. This chapter examines Australia and the UK&s;s legislative attempts to prevent potential foreign terrorist fighters from departing the relevant jurisdiction, as well as the legislative measures introduced to prevent suspected foreign terrorist fighters from returning home. The primary means by which the Australian and UK Parliaments have sought to prevent suspected foreign terrorist fighters from travelling overseas is through the enactment of new legislation and the amendment of existing legislation relating to passports and travel documents. There are three categories of persons whose return the Australian and UK Governments have sought to restrict: foreign nationals; foreign terrorist fighters who hold either sole or dual citizenship; or, foreign terrorist fighters&s; families. The chapter discusses these categories in detail.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

One of the defining features of State counter-terrorism responses to the foreign terrorist fighters phenomenon has been the enactment and amendment of immigration and citizenship laws. This chapter examines Australia and the UK&s;s legislative attempts to prevent potential foreign terrorist fighters from departing the relevant jurisdiction, as well as the legislative measures introduced to prevent suspected foreign terrorist fighters from returning home. The primary means by which the Australian and UK Parliaments have sought to prevent suspected foreign terrorist fighters from travelling overseas is through the enactment of new legislation and the amendment of existing legislation relating to passports and travel documents. There are three categories of persons whose return the Australian and UK Governments have sought to restrict: foreign nationals; foreign terrorist fighters who hold either sole or dual citizenship; or, foreign terrorist fighters&s; families. The chapter discusses these categories in detail.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

One of the defining features of State counter-terrorism responses to the foreign terrorist fighters phenomenon has been the enactment and amendment of immigration and citizenship laws. This chapter examines Australia and the UK&s;s legislative attempts to prevent potential foreign terrorist fighters from departing the relevant jurisdiction, as well as the legislative measures introduced to prevent suspected foreign terrorist fighters from returning home. The primary means by which the Australian and UK Parliaments have sought to prevent suspected foreign terrorist fighters from travelling overseas is through the enactment of new legislation and the amendment of existing legislation relating to passports and travel documents. There are three categories of persons whose return the Australian and UK Governments have sought to restrict: foreign nationals; foreign terrorist fighters who hold either sole or dual citizenship; or, foreign terrorist fighters&s; families. The chapter discusses these categories in detail.

Key concepts: Citizenship, Immigration, Political science, Sociology, Law, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Immigration and Citizenship — Research Paper | ScholarLens